@readfetch/mcp-x402-proxy
Related Servers
Alternatives to @readfetch/mcp-x402-proxy
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides browser automation capabilities using Playwright. This server enables LLMs to interact with web pages, take screenshots, and execute JavaScript in a real browser environment.3212,730 npm5,675MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server that lets AI agents scrape web pages as clean markdown for a micro-payment in USDC, using the x402 protocol on Base network. No API keys or signup required.MIT
Related Servers

halowerk-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides access to 70 paid APIs as MCP tools with per-call and session budgets, paying via x402/USDC on Base without requiring an account or login. Includes a built-in allowlist of hosts and safe defaults to prevent unintended payments.1472 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to call pay-per-use tools for search, PDF processing, web reading, extraction, summarization, fact-checking, translation, jobs, and discovery, with each call paid in USDC on Base via x402 and no API key or account required.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to access all endpoints of an x402 gateway by paying real-time microtransactions (USDC on Base) per API call, with automatic tool discovery and spend guardrails.2352 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables existing MCP clients to access paid MCP servers by signing x402 payments locally and proxying tool calls, with automatic line management, retries, and spend limits.379 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP proxy that connects to remote MCP servers and automatically handles x402 payments, signing USDC on-chain when a tool returns HTTP 402.17 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes a live catalogue of specialist tools as MCP endpoints and returns x402 payment challenges for each call, letting agents pay per use in USDC from their own wallet without subscriptions or API keys.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Descriptions explicitly route the agent between overlapping extraction tools (text = no JS, scrape = Chromium render, residential = IP-blocked sites, section = single selector, batch = many URLs), which resolves most ambiguity. Some boundary cases remain (text vs scrape vs residential on a JS-heavy blocked site), but the 'prefer X when Y' guidance is unusually explicit.
Every tool uses the readfetch_ prefix followed by a lowercase snake_case noun (text, scrape, fetch, batch, pdf, screenshot, search, crawl, crawl_status, probe, feedback). The pattern is uniform and predictable, with the nested crawl_status being the only compound and it reads naturally.
15 tools sits at the top of the well-scoped range but each maps to a distinct capability of a scraping proxy (discovery, extraction variants, rendering, raw HTTP, utilities). Nothing appears redundant enough to cut without losing a real use case.
The surface covers the full pipeline: discovery (map, search, probe), extraction (text, scrape, section, batch, pdf), crawling (crawl + crawl_status), raw HTTP, screenshots, and change detection. Minor gaps exist—no crawl cancel/delete, no structured/schema extraction, and the referenced claims/refund route is not exposed as a tool—but agents can work around these.