Skip to main content
Glama
rdutra

laya-mcp

by rdutra
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to laya-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jevcore-mcp

      PerryLink
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP hosts to query Jev's typed decision model—yes/no, choice, and score—with calibrated probabilities, while defaulting to an offline mock and disclosing all egress unless explicitly enabled.
      Apache 2.0

    • apple-fm-mcp

      yihan2099
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables local Apple on-device Foundation Model access via any MCP client, supporting text generation, structured output, and multi-turn chat on macOS.
      2
      MIT

    • local-mcp

      jkjoplin
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables running MCP tools against local MLX models on your Mac, with hardware-aware configuration, CLI streaming, and a dashboard for routing and monitoring.
      1,953 npm
      -
    • Jev MCP by freepik-company

      Jev MCPofficial

      freepik-company
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides MCP clients with typed, probabilistic decisions (choices, probabilities, scores) from TypeSafe's System One model, offering validated outputs and flexible provider support.
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • laya-mcp

      PerryLink
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables typed decisions (yes/no, choice, score) with transparent preflight checks, honest confidence reporting, and health monitoring.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    decide and batch_decide are clearly the single-item and batch variants of the same operation, while filter is a distinct conservative retention workflow. An agent might briefly hesitate between filter and repeated decide calls for relevance tasks, but the descriptions make each tool's purpose specific enough to avoid serious ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names are short, lowercase, action-oriented commands: info, decide, filter. batch_decide is the main deviation because it introduces an underscore and a compound form, but the naming remains readable and the relationship to decide is obvious.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is well-scoped for this server's purpose: server introspection, single decisions, batched decisions, and candidate filtering. Each tool covers a distinct core workflow without redundancy or unnecessary surface area.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full apparent workflow: checking server state and limits, making a single bounded decision, making batched decisions, and conservatively filtering candidates. Escalation is intentionally left to the caller, so there are no obvious dead ends or missing operations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources