Skip to main content
Glama
rdolan5

solidworks-mcp

by rdolan5

Related Servers

Alternatives to solidworks-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude or any MCP client to drive a live SOLIDWORKS session through its COM API, modeling parts, building assemblies with mates, checking interferences and machining feasibility, and exporting STEP or DXF files. It also exposes a local semantic index of the SOLIDWORKS API so the model can look up signatures, enums, and official examples before running arbitrary Python against the session.
      22
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP bridge server for SolidWorks that enables AI assistants to control SolidWorks programmatically via COM automation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling a live SOLIDWORKS session through the Windows COM API, enabling native CAD operations like sketches, features, bodies, views, and exports, plus transactional plans and vectorization.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI (e.g., Claude) to control SolidWorks via natural language, automating part creation, sketching, and feature operations through the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents such as Claude to drive SolidWorks through its COM API using natural language, creating parts and assemblies, sketching geometry, and adding features without clicking menus. Also supports running arbitrary API scripts and verifying results through model reports, rendered views, interference checks, and exports.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that controls SolidWorks via COM, enabling CAD automation with 138 tools for sketching, 3D features, assemblies, drawings, and more.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct by domain (sketch, feature, pattern, assembly, etc.), and the dispatcher design groups related operations under a single tool. However, generic tools like solidworks_api and solidworks_script overlap with all other tools, and legacy tools (solidworks_sketch_begin, solidworks_cam_workflow) partially duplicate functionality, creating minor selection ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'solidworks_' prefix and use snake_case, with names clearly indicating their purpose. The pattern is consistent, though there is a mix of verb-led (connect, open, save) and noun-led (active_document, assembly_tree) names, and legacy tools like sketch_begin vs sketch and cam_workflow vs cam introduce slight inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 40 tools, the count is above the typical 3–15 range and exceeds the 25+ heavy threshold. However, the domain (full CAD/CAM automation) is extensive, and many tools are dispatchers covering multiple operations, so the number is justifiable, though it feels heavy for an agent to navigate.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers document lifecycle, sketching, features, patterns, assemblies, parametric equations, materials, configurations, analysis, drawings, CAM, and persistent references. The inclusion of generic API and script tools ensures no capability gap, making the surface effectively complete for the stated SOLIDWORKS automation purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues