operations_rmdir

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that only empty directories can be removed, but lacks information on failure modes (e.g., if not empty), permissions required, or side effects. With no annotations, more detail would be beneficial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Short and front-loaded, but the single-sentence format could be improved by adding a brief usage note without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple deletion tool, but missing return value description (no output schema) and usage context. Could mention that remote must exist and that operation fails if directory not empty.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover all 4 parameters fully. Tool description adds no extra semantics beyond the purpose. Baseline of 3 applies due to high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Remove' and resource 'empty directory or container'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like operations_rmdirs (for non-empty) and operations_purge.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied that tool is only for empty directories, but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use instructions, nor alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.