ObsidianMCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to ObsidianMCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude Desktop to interact with an Obsidian vault through the Local REST API, allowing file listing, reading, searching, creating, and updating markdown notes.6,222 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLMs to interact with Obsidian vaults via the Local REST API plugin for comprehensive note management, file operations, and vault navigation. It supports creating and editing notes, executing Obsidian commands, and performing advanced searches using Dataview queries.65 npm52MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to create, read, update, and search notes in a local Obsidian vault, with automatic YAML frontmatter and folder management.71-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables bidirectional interaction with Obsidian vaults, allowing reading, writing, and organizing notes through Claude.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables Claude clients to interact with an Obsidian vault as a knowledge graph, supporting full-text search, backlink traversal, neighborhood exploration, and note creation/append.41173 npm14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to read, write, search, and manage an Obsidian vault with tools for notes, tags, folders, and full-text search.8 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
The tool set includes many similarly purposed tools, such as append_to_note vs. append_to_active_note and patch_note vs. patch_active_note, which could confuse an agent about which to use. However, the distinction between note-specific operations and active-note operations is clearly described, mitigating some ambiguity.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_active_note, append_to_note). A few tools like execute_command and search_dataview deviate slightly, but overall the naming is predictable and readable.
With 22 tools, the set is on the heavy side for an Obsidian MCP server. While many tools are justified, the presence of both generic and active-note variants for note operations inflates the count unnecessarily.
The tool set covers a wide range of operations including note creation, reading, updating, deletion, search, and periodic notes, which is fairly complete for Obsidian workflows. However, some operations like moving or renaming notes are missing, which could cause workarounds.