harness-bridge
Related Servers
Alternatives to harness-bridge
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates OpenAI Codex CLI with Claude Code via MCP, enabling code execution, analysis, fixing, and web search within Claude Code.1,265 npm1ISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP bridge for using local Claude CLI as a bounded reviewer and analysis delegate for Codex.5MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA local MCP bridge that connects Claude Code and OpenAI Codex via a durable SQLite mailbox, with support for orchestrating and resuming Codex sessions.174MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code or any MCP client to delegate hands-on coding work to OpenAI Codex over a persistent app-server process, keeping long-lived threads with follow-ups, async polling, approvals, steering, and interrupts. Supports native code review, resuming existing sessions, structured output, and parallel worktree-isolated tasks.1024 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceThe self-hosted MCP bridge between Claude Chat and Claude Code.46AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables Claude Code to delegate code generation and debugging to OpenAI Codex, with stall detection and auto-recovery.213 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a distinct specialized purpose—reviewing code, explaining code, critiquing plans, planning performance work, and implementing changes. However, codex_query is a catch-all that overlaps with all the other tools, which could create some selection ambiguity.
All tools share the codex_ prefix and use verb-oriented names, making the pattern easy to follow. The deviations are codex_query, which lacks an object, and codex_plan_perf, which uses an awkward abbreviation instead of a clear noun like performance.
Six tools is a well-scoped count for a Codex bridge. Each tool covers a meaningful developer workflow without unnecessary redundancy, and the set feels neither thin nor bloated.
The tool set covers the major interaction modes with Codex: reviewing, explaining, planning, performance analysis, implementation, and general Q&A. The generic codex_query prevents dead ends, though a security-specific review or similar niche tool could be added without much effort.