scherlok
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHERLOK_CONNECTION | Yes | Database connection string for Scherlok MCP server |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_tablesA | List the tables visible to the configured warehouse connection. Returns the table names (capped) and a total count. Use this to discover
what can be profiled before calling |
| investigateA | Profile tables and store them as the baseline for future anomaly checks. Pass |
| watchA | Profile tables and detect anomalies against the stored baseline. Returns the anomalies found (type, severity, message per table), capped.
Each also carries |
| statusA | Report the current monitoring state. Returns the connection target (password redacted), how many tables the connection can see, and how many anomalies were recorded in the last 30 days. A quick health glance without profiling anything. |
| historyA | Return anomalies recorded in the last Reads from the local profile store — does not re-profile the warehouse.
Only the configured connection's anomalies are returned. They carry the
same fields as |
| checkA | Run a watch over all tables and return a CI-style pass/fail gate.
|
| verifyA | Compare tables with the stored baseline and return a pass/fail gate, leaving it unchanged. Read-only, unlike
|
| reconcileA | Check that an output table adds up against the input it was built from. Read-only: compares |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
The four core tools (investigate, watch, check, verify) all profile tables against baselines and their boundaries hinge on subtle differences — does it save, does it gate, what scope. The unusually long descriptions do most of the disambiguation work, so an agent that skims will likely pick watch when it wanted verify or check. history, reconcile, list_tables and status are cleanly distinct.
Six of eight names are terse imperative verbs (investigate, watch, check, verify, reconcile) with one verb_noun (list_tables) and two nouns (history, status). The deviation is mild and each name reads naturally for its purpose, but 'history'/'status' break the action-verb pattern the rest follow.
Eight tools is well within a healthy range and each maps to a distinct step in the monitoring lifecycle: discover, baseline, detect, gate, history, reconcile, glance. No filler tools and nothing conspicuously missing from the count itself.
The surface covers discovery (list_tables), baselining (investigate), detection (watch), gating (check/verify), audit trail (history), reconciliation (reconcile) and health (status) — a full lifecycle. Gaps are minor: accepting a new baseline and unlocking/manging baselines are pushed to the `scherlok accept` CLI, so an agent cannot resolve a stuck CRITICAL anomaly on its own.