Skip to main content
Glama
rbctmz

mcp-server-strava

by rbctmz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-strava

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Strava MCP Server

      ctvidic
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables language models to interact with Strava data, including activities, athlete statistics, routes, achievements, and social features.
      6
      MIT

    • Strava MCP Server

      tomekkorbak
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides language models with access to Strava API data, allowing them to query and analyze athlete activities from Strava.
      4
      24
      MIT

    • Strava MCP server

      ls2g08
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local, read-only Model Context Protocol server for an athlete's Strava profile and activities, enabling retrieval of profile data, activity lists (with paging and date filters), and detailed activity information via standard input/output for MCP hosts.
      3
      10 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    There is significant overlap between analyze_activity and get_activity_by_id, as both appear to retrieve and process activity data based on activity_id, making them easily confused. analyze_training_load and get_activity_recommendations are more distinct but still related to activity analysis, creating some ambiguity in the set.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming is mixed with both English and Russian terms (e.g., analyze_activity vs. analyze_training_load in English, but get_activity_recommendations in Russian description), and the verb patterns vary (analyze_ vs. get_). While readable, this inconsistency reduces predictability and coherence.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 4 tools, the count is borderline thin for a Strava server, as it might lack broader functionality like user management, activity creation, or social features. However, it covers core analysis aspects, so it's not severely mismatched but feels slightly under-scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is focused on activity analysis and recommendations, but there are significant gaps: no CRUD operations for activities (e.g., create, update, delete), no user profile or authentication tools, and no social or leaderboard features typical of Strava's domain. This will likely cause agent failures for common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources