Skip to main content
Glama
razvangirgiz

wazap-mcp

by razvangirgiz

Learn how to use the WhatsApp tools

learn
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read this before using any WhatsApp tools to get the guide, ID formats, workflows, message shape, and error-code fixes. It never touches WhatsApp.

Instructions

Read this FIRST, before any other WhatsApp tool. Returns the guide to the tools, the id formats, the recommended workflows, the message shape and every error code with what to do about it. Takes no arguments and never touches WhatsApp.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
account_idNoRegistry account id (default, work, …). Omit to resolve from chat_id or message_id, or the default account.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv0.15.0
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / account_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Registry account id (default, work, …). Omit to resolve from chat_id or message_id, or the default account.",
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observedv0.9.3

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive/closed-world, so the safety bar is low. The description adds value by specifying exactly what content is returned (guide, id formats, workflows, message shape, error remediation) and reinforcing that it 'never touches WhatsApp,' useful given no output schema. Minor tension: it says 'Takes no arguments' while the schema exposes an optional account_id.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences with the imperative 'Read this FIRST' front-loaded, then the return contents, then the no-side-effect guarantee. No wasted words for a documentation tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-required-param meta tool with no output schema, the description fully covers purpose, timing, return contents, and side-effect profile. Nothing an agent needs before calling it is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so account_id's meaning is already fully documented in the schema, which sets the baseline at 3. The description's claim that it 'takes no arguments' adds no detail and is slightly at odds with the optional account_id, so it does not earn above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: returns the guide covering tools, id formats, recommended workflows, message shape, and error codes. The title and description together make clear this is the meta/documentation entry point, cleanly distinguished from all 32 sibling action tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs 'Read this FIRST, before any other WhatsApp tool,' which is an unambiguous when-to-use directive. For a bootstrap/documentation tool there is no meaningful alternative to exclude, so the guidance is complete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.