OpenAPI Directory MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenAPI Directory MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language exploration of OpenAPI/Swagger specs, allowing users to register APIs, browse endpoints, describe schemas, and detect breaking changes through conversational queries.9191 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to explore and query OpenAPI specifications, allowing natural language interaction with API endpoints, parameters, request bodies, and response schemas from any OpenAPI 3.x spec.10 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with access to OpenAPI specifications, enabling API discovery, schema retrieval, and direct API execution with support for OAuth 2.0 and other authentication methods.4 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to understand and interact with OpenAPI specifications, providing deep insight into API structures for faster and more accurate API integration.97 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceExposes Swagger/OpenAPI API documentation to AI models, enabling exploration, search, and interaction with endpoints, schemas, and execution of API calls.143 npm2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes OpenAPI specifications as MCP tools, enabling AI assistants to explore and understand API structures, endpoints, schemas, and documentation through semantic queries.2 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 22 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose. The many 'get_' tools target different aspects (API summary vs full details, endpoint details vs examples vs schemas, providers vs provider APIs vs provider services), and cache tools are separate. No two tools are ambiguous.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with 'get_' for retrieval. However, a few list operations use 'list_' (list_all_apis, list_cache_keys) instead of 'get_', introducing minor inconsistency. Otherwise naming is predictable.
With 22 tools, the set is at the upper end of what is reasonable for an API directory server. The tools cover APIs, endpoints, providers, cache, and metrics, but the number feels slightly heavy, bordering on excessive for the domain.
The server provides comprehensive coverage for querying an API directory: listing, searching, detailed info on APIs and endpoints, provider stats, cache management, and metrics. A minor gap is the lack of a dedicated tool to list API categories (only distribution analysis), but overall the surface is solid.