Skip to main content
Glama
rawtreedb

RawTree MCP Server

Official
by rawtreedb

Related Servers

Alternatives to RawTree MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only analytical access to local CSV, Parquet, JSON files or a DuckDB database through MCP, with table discovery, column profiling, guarded SQL querying, and explain plans for safe use with Claude Desktop and Claude Code.
      8
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to connect to 17+ databases and query/analyze data using natural language via MCP and HTTP APIs, supporting platforms like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and VS Code.
      42
      64 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language queries and management of databases and subscribed data shares through Anthropic's Model Context Protocol.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables querying JSON/JSONL social datasets in Claude Desktop via MCP tools, using DuckDB as the backend database.
      8
      -

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly partitioned by resource and action, and descriptions clearly distinguish boundaries between cluster, database, table, connector, app, and key operations. Minor confusion is possible between similarly named tools such as list-clusters vs list-cluster-sizes and the two S3 verification tools, but they target different objects.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The tool set follows a consistent kebab-case verb-noun pattern throughout, including list-clusters, create-table, delete-api-key, and set-connector-status. There is no mixed casing or vague standalone verb naming, making the set predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 37 tools, the server is well above the 25+ threshold and spans many domains. Although each tool maps to a platform operation, the surface is heavy and likely to make tool selection harder and consume unnecessary context.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows are covered, but notable lifecycle gaps exist: clusters can be created, updated, paused, and resumed but not deleted; connectors can be created and modified but not deleted, and destinations cannot be removed. Databases and tables also lack full update coverage, creating potential dead ends for cleanup and migration tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues