Skip to main content
Glama
ravnlab

review-gate-mcp

by ravnlab
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to review-gate-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • docintel-mcp

      reshma449
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A document intelligence MCP server that extracts text and structured fields from business documents, routes low-confidence extractions to a human review queue, and enables searching across processed documents.
      MIT

    • mcp-trustlayer

      neelbarm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets an agent verify its own extracted data against a policy, returning per-field dispositions (post, review, or escaped) to catch confidently wrong answers.
      2
      MIT

    • pdf-triage-mcp

      vishalmeena2211
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for local PDF inspection that classifies, searches, extracts text and tables without uploading documents or relying on OCR, surfacing reliability warnings for garbled or scanned content.
      4
      21 npm
      MIT

    • PDF Reader MCP Server

      averagejoeslab
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides comprehensive PDF processing capabilities including text extraction, image extraction, table detection, annotation extraction, metadata retrieval, page rendering, and document structure analysis.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: extraction, resolving held items, and listing the queue. No overlap or ambiguity between the three.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names use snake_case and follow a verb-focused pattern (extract_with_gate, resolve_review, review_queue). The 'with_gate' modifier is slightly unconventional but consistent within the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is appropriate for the narrow domain of document extraction with human review. The count feels minimal but sufficient for the core workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the primary extraction workflow (extract, review queue, resolve). Minor gaps like skipping or rejecting items are absent but not critical for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources