Skip to main content
Glama
ravinwebsurgeon

DataForSEO MCP Server

dataforseo_labs_google_competitors_domain

Analyze competitor domains in Google search to compare ranking, traffic, and keyword metrics for organic and paid results, helping identify competitive opportunities.

Instructions

This endpoint will provide you with a full overview of ranking and traffic data of the competitor domains from organic and paid search. In addition to that, you will get the metrics specific to the keywords both competitor domains and your domain rank for within the same SERP.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
targetYestarget domain
location_nameNofull name of the location required field only in format "Country" (not "City" or "Region") example: 'United Kingdom', 'United States', 'Canada'United States
language_codeNolanguage code required field example: enen
ignore_synonymsNoignore highly similar keywords, if set to true, results will be more accurate
limitNoMaximum number of keywords to return
offsetNooffset in the results array of returned keywords optional field default value: 0 if you specify the 10 value, the first ten keywords in the results array will be omitted and the data will be provided for the successive keywords
filtersNoyou can add several filters at once (8 filters maximum) you should set a logical operator and, or between the conditions the following operators are supported: regex, not_regex, <, <=, >, >=, =, <>, in, not_in, match, not_match, ilike, not_ilike, like, not_like you can use the % operator with like and not_like, as well as ilike and not_ilike to match any string of zero or more characters merge operator must be a string and connect two other arrays, availible values: or, and. example: ["metrics.organic.count",">",50] [["metrics.organic.pos_1","<>",0],"and",["metrics.organic.impressions_etv",">=","10"]] [[["metrics.organic.count",">=",50],"and",["metrics.organic.pos_1","in",[1,5]]], "or", ["metrics.organic.etv",">=","100"]]
order_byNoresults sorting rules optional field you can use the same values as in the filters array to sort the results possible sorting types: asc – results will be sorted in the ascending order desc – results will be sorted in the descending order you should use a comma to set up a sorting parameter default rule: ["relevance,desc"] example: ["relevance,desc","keyword_info.search_volume,desc"]
exclude_top_domainsNoindicates whether to exclude world's largest websites optional field default value: false set to true if you want to get highly-relevant competitors excluding the top websites
include_clickstream_dataNoInclude or exclude data from clickstream-based metrics in the result
item_typesNodisplay results by item type indicates the type of search results included in the response
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While it mentions the type of data returned (ranking, traffic, keyword metrics), it lacks critical behavioral details such as whether this is a read-only operation, potential rate limits, authentication requirements, data freshness, or pagination behavior. For a complex tool with 11 parameters, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, well-structured sentence that efficiently conveys the core functionality without unnecessary details. It's appropriately front-loaded with the main purpose. While it could potentially be split for clarity, it avoids redundancy and stays focused on the tool's value proposition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (11 parameters, no annotations, no output schema), the description is insufficiently complete. It doesn't address behavioral aspects like safety, performance, or error handling, and provides no guidance on interpreting results. For a tool that likely returns rich competitive analysis data, the description should offer more context about the output structure and typical use cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, meaning all parameters are well-documented in the input schema itself. The description doesn't add any meaningful parameter semantics beyond what's already in the schema—it doesn't explain parameter relationships, provide usage examples, or clarify complex parameters like 'filters' and 'order_by.' With high schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides 'a full overview of ranking and traffic data of the competitor domains from organic and paid search' and 'metrics specific to the keywords both competitor domains and your domain rank for within the same SERP.' This is a specific verb+resource combination (analyze competitor domains and keyword metrics). However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'dataforseo_labs_google_serp_competitors' or 'backlinks_competitors,' which may offer overlapping functionality.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools in the 'dataforseo_labs_google_' and 'backlinks_' categories, there's no mention of specific use cases, prerequisites, or comparisons to help the agent choose appropriately. The description only states what the tool does, not when it should be selected.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ravinwebsurgeon/seo-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server