Skip to main content
Glama

explore_file

Inspect a source file's structure to list all classes, methods, and properties with signatures and docstrings. Quickly understand a module's layout without reading the full file.

Instructions

Read-only file anatomy inspection. Use this to list all classes, methods, and properties within a specific source file without reading its entire contents. Provides a structural bird's-eye view of a file, showing entity signatures and docstrings to quickly grasp a module's layout.

Usage: Use AFTER identifying an interesting file via 'search_hybrid_context' to understand its available methods, or before modifying a file. Do NOT use this for searching across multiple files.

Behaviour & Return: Read-only operation. Returns a Markdown-formatted outline of the file's entities, grouped by type (Classes, Methods, Interfaces), including line numbers for direct editor navigation. No side effects.

Path handling: file_path should be a repo-relative path (e.g. 'src/services/user.ts'). Absolute paths under your local checkout are also accepted; the tool strips the known local root automatically. The returned file_path is normalized to the same repo-relative form regardless of how it was queried. If the query is ambiguous across multiple repositories, the answer includes an 'ambiguous_path_candidates' list — retry with a longer path or pass repo_name.

Parameter guidance: 'file_path' must be a relative or absolute path to a valid source file. Include 'repo_name' if the file path might be ambiguous across multiple indexed repositories.

Supports Java, Kotlin, and TypeScript codebases.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
file_pathYesPath to the source file to explore. PREFERRED: a repo-relative path (e.g. 'src/services/user.ts'). ALSO ACCEPTED: an absolute path under the repository's local checkout (the tool strips KNOT_REPO_PATH / CWD automatically).
repo_nameNoOptional but HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: repository name to filter results to a specific codebase (e.g., 'my-java-repo'). If you know the repository you are working on, include this in your FIRST query to avoid mixed results from other indexed projects. Omit only to search across all repositories.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description fully covers behavioral traits. It declares the operation as read-only with no side effects, describes the return format (Markdown outline with line numbers), and details path handling behavior including normalization and ambiguity resolution.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively long but well-structured with clear sections (Usage, Behaviour & Return, Path handling, Parameter guidance). While every sentence adds value, slight redundancy exists (e.g., repetition of file_path details). Overall efficient for the complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description explains the return type (Markdown outline with entity groupings and line numbers). It covers all necessary aspects: purpose, usage context, behavioral traits, parameter details, edge cases (ambiguous paths), and supported languages. No gaps remain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, but the description adds significant value beyond the schema. For file_path, it explains preferred relative paths, absolute path acceptance, and normalization. For repo_name, it clarifies when to include it and the behavior when omitted, which is critical for correct usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it's a 'Read-only file anatomy inspection' tool for listing classes, methods, and properties within a specific source file. It distinguishes itself from siblings like 'search_hybrid_context' by explicitly noting it is not for searching across multiple files.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use: 'Use AFTER identifying an interesting file via search_hybrid_context to understand its available methods, or before modifying a file.' Also states what not to use for: 'Do NOT use this for searching across multiple files.'

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/raultov/knot'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server