claude-to-agy
Related Servers
Alternatives to claude-to-agy
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP bridge that lets Claude Code delegate heavy tasks to the Antigravity CLI (agy) — purpose-built tools, model routing with fallback, session continuity, and output truncation to save Claude's context and tokens.6111 npm51MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets Claude Code call the Google Antigravity CLI (agy) headlessly for a second opinion from a different model family, or to have agy read project files on Claude's behalf so large files never enter Claude's context window.18 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP bridge that lets Codex delegate long-running agent work to the Antigravity CLI, providing observable and resumable tool-based execution with project scoping.1328 PyPI10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that bridges Claude Code to Google Antigravity's CLI, enabling Claude to orchestrate Gemini workers in parallel for reading, writing, verifying, and autonomous tasks. It provides tools for single dispatch, parallel fan-out, background jobs, and handles permission, cwd, and shell pitfalls.2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude Code delegate heavy tasks (file analysis, deep search, web lookups, adversarial review, and general delegation) to the Antigravity CLI (agy), with model routing, session continuity, timeout controls, and quota-aware failover.91,073 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that bridges Claude Code with Antigravity CLI using a Swarm Agent architecture to optimize local development workflows and minimize LLM token costs. Includes a web UI for monitoring agent workflows.24451 PyPI22MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no risk of confusion between tools. The single tool's purpose is clearly described, so an agent can easily identify what it does.
The tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern ('delegate_to_agy'), consistent with common conventions. With only one tool, naming consistency is inherent.
One tool is sparse for a typical MCP server. While the server serves a narrow purpose (delegation to AGY), the single tool may feel insufficient for complex workflows, but it is not excessively heavy.
The server covers its stated purpose of delegation, but lacks additional tools for managing delegations (e.g., status checks, result retrieval, error handling). There are minor gaps that could affect agent reliability.