aidoo_get_member_bookings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It states a read operation but does not disclose pagination behavior (despite limit/offset parameters) or clarify that 'alle' (all) may be limited by pagination. This is a notable gap for a tool with no structured safety annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence that is front-loaded with the action and resource. Every word earns its place; there is no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with a fully described schema and no output schema, the description conveys the core scope. However, it lacks any mention of pagination semantics, sorting, or what 'all' means given the limit/offset parameters, preventing it from being fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%: all three parameters (member_id, limit, offset) have individual descriptions. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond mapping 'bestimmten Mitglieds' to member_id, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Rufe ab' = retrieve) and a specific resource ('Buchungen eines bestimmten Mitglieds' = bookings of a specific member). It clearly distinguishes itself from sibling tools like aidoo_list_bookings by scoping to a single member.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as aidoo_list_bookings or aidoo_get_member. The sibling tools are not mentioned, and there is no context about prerequisites or selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.