Skip to main content
Glama
Webmail MCP

Webmail MCP

by rasty49

Related Servers

Alternatives to Webmail MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects MCP clients to any IMAP/SMTP email account, enabling email search, reading, sending, replying, forwarding, flagging, moving, and folder management via natural language.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage email accounts via IMAP/SMTP, including reading, searching, sending emails with attachments and calendar invites, all through natural language interactions with MCP-compatible clients.
      1
      32 PyPI
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching, reading full conversations, and sending email across multiple IMAP/SMTP mailboxes from any MCP client, with multi-user support and per-user API tokens.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables remote email management for Gmail, Outlook, iCloud, Yahoo, and custom IMAP/SMTP accounts via MCP, supporting account setup, search, read, draft, and send operations.
      20 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to work with ordinary email accounts over IMAP and SMTP — listing mailboxes, searching and reading messages, managing flags, folders, attachments and drafts, and sending, replying or forwarding mail. Supports multiple accounts and providers with per-account safety controls such as read-only mode, send/delete restrictions, recipient allow-lists and rate limits.
      116 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading and sending emails via IMAP and SMTP through the MCP protocol. Supports multiple email accounts and configuration via UI or environment variables.
      BSD 3-Clause

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct step: enumerate folders, search, read, stage a draft, inspect that draft, send it. The only mild overlap is between local_draft_status and the preview returned by prepare_email, but the descriptions clearly separate state-checking from draft creation.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a verb_noun pattern (list_folders, search_email, read_email, prepare_email, send_prepared_email). local_draft_status breaks the pattern with a noun phrase and a 'local_' prefix, which is a minor but noticeable deviation.

    Tool Count4/5

    Six tools is a tight, coherent set for a webmail server with deliberately restricted write capabilities. It is slightly thin in that there is no tool to enumerate prepared drafts, so status checks require an ID from memory.

    Completeness3/5

    The read path (folders, search, read) and the controlled send path (prepare, status, send) are covered, but common lifecycle operations like delete/archive/move, reply, and forward are absent. These gaps are partly intentional (no attachments, no Bcc), yet agents will hit dead ends for routine mailbox management.