Skip to main content
Glama
rashedInt32

jev-mcp

by rashedInt32
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to jev-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • jev-domain-mcp

      jiawei686
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to call typed code-review and content-moderation decision tools, returning structured verdicts, probabilities, and confidence-gated actions.
      2
      MIT

    • laya-mcp

      PerryLink
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables typed decisions (yes/no, choice, score) with transparent preflight checks, honest confidence reporting, and health monitoring.
      147 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • jev-mcp

      IIXINGCHEN
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to submit a state and typed questions and receive structured judgments such as yes/no probabilities, named choices, and rubric scores, with no text generation or parsing.
      MIT

    • Hunch MCP

      Eddy1919
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to obtain calibrated probabilities, option picks, scale scores, and multi-question judgments for batches of short text, returning numeric results for sorting, filtering, and counting.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing models, picking one from a set, scoring on a scale, yes/no checking, and batching multiple independent questions. The descriptions clarify boundaries (e.g., jev_check is specifically for yes/no, while jev_classify handles arbitrary options). No overlap that would cause an agent to misselect.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the consistent 'jev_' prefix, but the second part is mostly verbs (classify, ask, score, check) except for 'models' which is a noun. This is a minor deviation from a strict verb pattern, but still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a classification/scoring API. Each tool earns its place and covers distinct operations without redundancy. This is within the ideal 3-15 range and appropriate for the server's purpose.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers the core operations: model discovery, single-label classification, ordered scoring, binary checks, and batched multi-question inference. There are no obvious gaps for the apparent domain; agents can perform all necessary workflows without workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources