Skip to main content
Glama
rasdaman

Rasdaman MCP Server

Official
by rasdaman

Related Servers

Alternatives to Rasdaman MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with rasdaman databases, allowing users to list coverages, describe datacubes, and execute WCPS queries.
      5
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to work with Copernicus Marine ocean data through semantic tools for dataset discovery, metadata retrieval, recommendation, validation, point time-series extraction, area statistics, subsetting, and computation without exposing raw API plumbing.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to perform geospatial analysis, spatial data processing, vector and raster operations, coordinate transformations, spatial statistics, mapping, and access to climate, satellite, and other geospatial data through MCP-compatible clients.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Geo-INQUIRE OGC API Processes for geospatial operations, including planning, execution, and job management through natural language.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language interaction with a GeoServer instance for managing workspaces, datastores, feature types, layers, styles, and OGC services (WMS/WFS) via an LLM-powered agent.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action: listing coverages, describing a coverage, learning WCPS basics, executing a query, listing doc chapters, and fetching a chapter. The documentation tools are explicitly tiered (crash course -> chapter index -> chapter body), so there is little risk of misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The names are in readable snake_case, but they mix bare verb_noun names (list_coverages, describe_coverage, execute_wcps_query) with wcps_-prefixed resource-style names (wcps_query_crash_course, wcps_doc_chapters, wcps_get_chapter). The prefix and verb placement are inconsistent even though the overall style is still navigable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is an appropriate size for a rasdaman querying server: coverage discovery, metadata inspection, query execution, and three levels of documentation. No tool feels redundant or missing at a high level.

    Completeness4/5

    The discover -> describe -> learn -> execute -> debug workflow is well covered. Minor gaps include a lack of write/ingest/update/delete operations for coverages and no explicit way to retrieve the contents of large result files, but these are likely outside the server's query-focused scope.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues