Rasdaman MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Rasdaman MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with rasdaman databases, allowing users to list coverages, describe datacubes, and execute WCPS queries.5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to work with Copernicus Marine ocean data through semantic tools for dataset discovery, metadata retrieval, recommendation, validation, point time-series extraction, area statistics, subsetting, and computation without exposing raw API plumbing.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform geospatial analysis, spatial data processing, vector and raster operations, coordinate transformations, spatial statistics, mapping, and access to climate, satellite, and other geospatial data through MCP-compatible clients.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables interaction with Geo-INQUIRE OGC API Processes for geospatial operations, including planning, execution, and job management through natural language.-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural language interaction with a GeoServer instance for managing workspaces, datastores, feature types, layers, styles, and OGC services (WMS/WFS) via an LLM-powered agent.1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query Earth observation data, satellite imagery, active fires, and weather via natural language, returning interactive maps and briefs.12-
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct action: listing coverages, describing a coverage, learning WCPS basics, executing a query, listing doc chapters, and fetching a chapter. The documentation tools are explicitly tiered (crash course -> chapter index -> chapter body), so there is little risk of misselection.
The names are in readable snake_case, but they mix bare verb_noun names (list_coverages, describe_coverage, execute_wcps_query) with wcps_-prefixed resource-style names (wcps_query_crash_course, wcps_doc_chapters, wcps_get_chapter). The prefix and verb placement are inconsistent even though the overall style is still navigable.
Six tools is an appropriate size for a rasdaman querying server: coverage discovery, metadata inspection, query execution, and three levels of documentation. No tool feels redundant or missing at a high level.
The discover -> describe -> learn -> execute -> debug workflow is well covered. Minor gaps include a lack of write/ingest/update/delete operations for coverages and no explicit way to retrieve the contents of large result files, but these are likely outside the server's query-focused scope.