Skip to main content
Glama
random-robbie

MCP Web Browser Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Web Browser Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Headless browser automation for LLM agents via REST API or MCP tools. Enables navigating pages, reading structured content, clicking elements, filling forms, and executing JavaScript.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A server that enables AI assistants to control a browser through tools, allowing them to perform web automation tasks like navigation, typing, clicking, and taking screenshots.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables browser automation and web scraping with multi-session management, supporting page navigation, element interaction, network request capture, and content extraction across multiple concurrent browser instances.
      4 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for browser automation using Puppeteer that enables AI assistants to navigate web pages, interact with UI elements, and capture screenshots. It supports comprehensive web tasks including form filling, content extraction, and executing custom JavaScript within the browser context.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready browser automation server that enables AI assistants to interact with web pages using tools for navigation, element interaction, and data extraction. It features a built-in Inspector UI and robust crash recovery for reliable automated testing and information retrieval.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: navigation, clicking, text extraction, link extraction, screenshot capture, and text input. The descriptions reinforce these distinct functions, making it easy for an agent to select the right tool for each task without confusion.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tools follow a consistent verb_noun or verb_adjective_noun pattern (e.g., browse_to, click_element, extract_text_content), with all names using snake_case. The only minor deviation is 'get_page_links' and 'get_page_screenshots' using 'get' instead of a more specific verb like 'extract', but this is still readable and maintains overall consistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools, this server is well-scoped for basic web browsing automation, covering essential actions like navigation, interaction, and content extraction. Each tool earns its place without being overly complex or insufficient for the domain, making it manageable and effective for typical use cases.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides solid coverage for core web browsing tasks, including navigation, interaction (clicking and input), and content extraction (text, links, screenshots). A minor gap is the lack of tools for more advanced actions like form submission, scrolling, or handling pop-ups, but agents can likely work around this with the existing tools for most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues