LSP Tools MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to LSP Tools MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides powerful regex-based code refactoring and search tools for Coding Agents.236 npm7MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables keyword search within files, returning matching lines with line numbers.11-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing file search and question tools for AI models. Enables keyword search in files with line numbers and integration with external chat services.297 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for local repository indexing and code understanding, enabling semantic search, AST analysis, dependency tracking, and symbol resolution.744 npmISC
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to read, search, and analyze code files with advanced caching and real-time file watching capabilities.615 npm39MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables token-aware directory exploration and file analysis for LLMs, helping them understand codebases through intelligent scanning and reporting.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes with no overlap. find_regex_position performs a specific text search operation on files, while list_allowed_directories provides metadata about server permissions. An agent would never confuse these tools as they serve fundamentally different functions in the workflow.
Both tools follow a clear verb_noun naming pattern (find_regex_position, list_allowed_directories) with consistent snake_case formatting. The naming is logical and predictable, though with only two tools it's difficult to assess full consistency across a larger set.
With only 2 tools, this server feels severely underpowered for an LSP (Language Server Protocol) context. LSP servers typically handle numerous language operations like diagnostics, completions, definitions, and references. This minimal toolset suggests either an incomplete implementation or a very narrow specialization that doesn't match typical LSP expectations.
For an LSP server, this toolset is severely incomplete. While the two provided tools are useful (file search and directory listing), they represent only a tiny fraction of expected LSP functionality. Missing are core language features like code completion, hover information, go-to-definition, references, diagnostics, formatting, and other standard LSP capabilities that agents would expect from such a server.