engineering-standards
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@engineering-standards Show me the git conventions standard"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
███████╗███╗ ██╗ ██████╗ ███████╗████████╗██████╗ ███████╗
██╔════╝████╗ ██║██╔════╝ ██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝██╔══██╗██╔════╝
█████╗ ██╔██╗ ██║██║ ███╗ ███████╗ ██║ ██║ ██║███████╗
██╔══╝ ██║╚██╗██║██║ ██║ ╚════██║ ██║ ██║ ██║╚════██║
███████╗██║ ╚████║╚██████╔╝██╗███████║ ██║ ██████╔╝███████║
╚══════╝╚═╝ ╚═══╝ ╚═════╝ ╚═╝╚══════╝ ╚═╝ ╚═════╝ ╚══════╝
⚡ Engineering Standards MCP Server ⚡
Your engineering brain, exported as a protocol.Good engineering habits shouldn't live in your head — they should be encoded, shareable, and enforceable.
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ │ query │ │ read │ ◆ git │
│ Claude Code ├─────────►│ MCP Server ├─────────►│ ◆ reviews │
│ / Desktop │ │ (this thing) │ │ ◆ PRs │
│ │◄─────────┤ │◄─────────┤ ◆ testing │
│ │ response │ │ standard │ ◆ rails │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ frontend │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ deploy │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ incidents │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ observe │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ api │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ database │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ ADRs │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ debt │
│ │ │ │ │ ◆ staff │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ └──────────────┘
YOU + AI Protocol Layer Standards DB🛠️ Tools
Tool | Description |
| Retrieve a specific engineering standard (14 available — see Standards Included below) |
| Check if a branch name follows conventions |
| Check if a commit message follows conventions |
| Get the staff engineer thinking checklist for a given phase of work |
Related MCP server: ForgeCraft
📚 Standards Included
General
Standard | Key | Covers |
Git Conventions |
| Branch naming, commits, rebase workflow, commit hygiene |
Code Review |
| Tone, structure, what to look for, giving and receiving feedback |
PR Standards |
| Size, description, pre-merge checklist, hotfix protocol |
Staff Engineer Checklist |
| Thinking prompts for each phase of work |
Rails
Standard | Key | Covers |
Rails Standards |
| Architecture, security, performance, migrations, Hotwire, deployment |
Testing Philosophy |
| Rails/RSpec strategy, FactoryBot, system specs, N+1 detection, CI integration |
Frontend
Standard | Key | Covers |
Frontend Standards |
| TypeScript, components, accessibility, state management, performance, testing, security |
Operations
Standard | Key | Covers |
Deployment Standards |
| Three-phase migration strategy, strong_migrations, zero-downtime deploys, rollback strategy |
Incident Response |
| Severity levels, incident commander, postmortems, on-call, game days |
Observability |
| Structured logging, metrics (RED/USE), alerting, SLIs/SLOs, dashboards, tracing |
Architecture
Standard | Key | Covers |
API Design |
| REST conventions, versioning, error format, pagination, idempotency |
Database Design |
| PostgreSQL/Rails, indexing, constraints, partitioning, connection management |
Architecture Decision Records |
| ADR template, when to write them, lifecycle, ADR vs RFC |
Technical Debt |
| Classification, severity, when to pay it down, prevention, metrics |
🤖 Companion Agents
The MCP provides the what (your team's standards). These agents provide the how (code generation and implementation).
From awesome-claude-code-subagents:
Agent | Role |
Rails 7.x/8.x implementation, version-aware patterns, Hotwire, deployment | |
React, Vue, Angular — TypeScript, accessibility, component architecture |
When the MCP returns a standard, it includes a reference to the relevant agent. Claude Code can then delegate implementation to that agent automatically.
⚙️ Setup
1. Install
git clone https://github.com/rajgurung/claude-engineering-standards.git
cd claude-engineering-standards
npm install
npm run build2. Register
Add to your MCP settings file:
Client | Config file |
Claude Code |
|
Claude Desktop |
|
{
"mcpServers": {
"engineering-standards": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/engineering-standards-mcp/build/index.js"]
}
}
}📋 Wiring It Into Your Projects
Once the MCP is registered, add a CLAUDE.md to your project root so Claude Code knows to consult it:
## Engineering Standards
This project follows team engineering standards via the engineering-standards MCP server.
### Before writing code
- Call `get_standard("rails")` for architecture and conventions
- Call `get_standard("testing")` for test strategy
- Call `get_standard("api_design")` before building or modifying API endpoints
- Call `get_standard("database_design")` before schema changes
- Call `get_standard("deployment")` before any migration or deploy work
### Before committing
- Call `review_branch_name` to validate your branch name
- Call `review_commit_message` to validate your commit message
### Before opening a PR
- Call `staff_engineer_review` with phase `before_pr`
- Call `get_standard("code_review")` for review expectations
### During incidents
- Call `get_standard("incident_response")` for severity levels and response protocol
- Call `get_standard("observability")` for debugging and monitoring guidance
### Implementation
- Use the rails-expert agent for Rails code generation
- Use the frontend-developer agent for frontend workAdapt this to your stack — remove what doesn't apply, add project-specific rules. The
CLAUDE.mdstays small because the standards live in the MCP, not in every repo.
🎨 Customising
The standards are plain markdown files in src/standards/. Edit them to match your team's conventions, then rebuild:
src/standards/
├── git-conventions.md ← branch naming, commits
├── code-review.md ← review tone & structure
├── pr-standards.md ← PR size, checklists
├── staff-engineer-checklist.md ← thinking prompts
├── testing-philosophy.md ← test strategy (Rails/RSpec)
├── rails-standards.md ← Rails conventions + rails-expert agent
├── frontend-standards.md ← Frontend conventions + frontend-developer agent
├── deployment-standards.md ← Safe deploys, migrations, rollback strategy
├── incident-response.md ← Severity levels, postmortems, on-call
├── observability.md ← Logging, metrics, alerting, SLIs/SLOs
├── api-design.md ← REST conventions, versioning, error format
├── database-design.md ← PostgreSQL/Rails, indexing, partitioning
├── architecture-decisions.md ← ADR template and lifecycle
└── technical-debt.md ← Classification, prioritisation, preventionnpm run build🧑💻 Development
npm run dev # Watch mode — recompiles on change
npm run build # One-off build
npm start # Run the server📄 License
MIT
Available Tools
4 toolsget_standardGet Engineering StandardA
Retrieve a specific engineering standard. Available standards: git, code_review, pr, staff_engineer, testing, rails, frontend, deployment, incident_response, observability, api_design, database_design, architecture_decisions, technical_debt, standup
Inputs: standard (required).
review_branch_nameReview Branch NameA
Check if a git branch name follows conventions (issue ID prefix, kebab-case)
Inputs: branch_name (required).
review_commit_messageReview Commit MessageA
Check if a commit message follows conventions (imperative mood, subject length, structure)
Inputs: message (required).
staff_engineer_reviewStaff Engineer ReviewB
Run through the staff engineer thinking checklist for a given context (pre-code, pre-pr, post-merge, incident)
Inputs: phase (required), context.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_standard retrieves documentation, review_branch_name and review_commit_message validate specific artifacts, and staff_engineer_review runs a workflow checklist. No two tools overlap or could cause misselection.
Three tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_standard, review_branch_name, review_commit_message), but staff_engineer_review breaks the pattern by leading with a noun and using 'review' as a noun rather than a verb. This is a minor inconsistency in an otherwise predictable convention.
Four tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and appropriately scoped for a standards server. Each tool earns its place for retrieval, validation, and checklist support without redundancy.
The server covers the core needs of retrieving standards and validating branch names and commit messages, plus a staff engineer review checklist. Minor gaps exist like PR title validation or code style checks, but agents can retrieve standards and apply them manually, so no severe dead ends.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
30+ deterministic dev and delivery tools: linting, metrics, diagrams, model advice, AI-text checks.
Your team's shipping standards, org map and delivery metrics, inside your coding agent.
Enforces architectural invariants and code quality rules inside your AI agent's edit loop.
Packmind captures, scales, and enforces your organization's technical decisions.
Related MCP Servers
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenancePolicy and quality engine for AI coding agents that enforces team coding standards and provides validation gates for agent-assisted software delivery.754 npm5MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides a quality framework and enforceable conventions for AI coding assistants, ensuring code quality, environment hygiene, and project standards across multiple AI tools.83 npm3-
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnforces design systems and vocabulary via ontology checks, candidate scanning, linting, and structural search across repositories.759Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to enforce a software delivery standard by validating artifacts against declarative rules, providing templates, glossary terms, and pass/fail verdicts with actionable blockers.8MIT