pbi-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to pbi-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to author and edit Power BI files locally (.pbix/PBIP), covering semantic models, reports, and Power Query M with 490 tools.10023 npm3Cryptographic Autonomy 1.0 (Combined Work Exception)
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceCreates, inspects, validates, and modifies Power BI Project (.pbip) folders, generating PBIR-style reports and TMDL semantic models from structured inputs.52-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to work end-to-end with Power BI and Fabric through 26 high-level tools that orchestrate specialized engines for semantic modeling, report authoring, cloud operations, validation, and visualization UX.26MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLM clients to analyze and interact with Power BI (.pbix) files, providing access to data models, DAX measures, Power Query code, table relationships, and data contents through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server for Power BI Desktop automation. Automate semantic model changes, DAX, Power Query, Excel, and report layout from MCP-capable AI clients.1001MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceBuild Power BI reports with natural language through an MCP server that connects AI assistants to Power BI's PBIR file format for creating pages, visuals, themes, and filters locally.5720MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action (e.g., create vs. bulk create, list measures vs. get model) with no overlap. Even similar tools like pbi_create_measure and pbi_bulk_create_measures are clearly separated by batch vs. single.
All tools start with 'pbi_' followed by a verb_noun pattern for most (pbi_list_measures, pbi_create_measure), but pbi_model_lineage uses noun_verb, breaking the pattern. Still, the naming is clear and readable overall.
With 13 tools covering project setup, model inspection, measure CRUD, column and relationship creation, and backup management, the count is well-scoped for the Power BI model domain—not too few or too many.
The set covers core operations well (measure CRUD, column/relationship creation, calc groups, backups), but lacks update/delete for columns, relationships, and calc groups, leaving some lifecycle gaps.