tasie-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to tasie-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server enabling Codex and ChatGPT to read/write files, execute commands, manage processes, use Git, and inspect images on the user's machine with full privileges.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server that lets ChatGPT work with your local codebase through explicit tools.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA secure MCP server that exposes local repository context to ChatGPT/Codex with read-only access, path validation, and no generic shell.17-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceStandalone MCP server that provides security scanning, project mapping, and vulnerability fix generation to AI coding assistants.235 npm2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server bridging ChatGPT to local OpenHarness tools, enabling file reads/writes, grep, LSP, and shell execution on a workspace.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes a 60+ tool security and threat-intel stack to AI agents, enabling secret scanning, Sigma rule generation, ransomware lookup, OSINT, and deep research.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action: framework detection, vulnerability scanning (code, dependencies, repo), remediation, and health checking. No two tools appear to do the same thing, and their descriptions clearly delineate the use cases.
Five of six tools follow the verb_noun pattern (detect_frameworks, remediate_file, scan_code, scan_dependencies, scan_repo). The outlier is tasie_health, which uses a noun_health format and breaks the predictable verb-led pattern.
With six tools, the set is well-scoped for a security scanning MCP server. Each tool covers a distinct and necessary capability without redundancy or bloat.
The tool surface covers the core workflow: detect frameworks, scan code and dependencies, scan full repos, remediate, and check health. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no tool for managing or re-listing past findings), but no critical dead ends are present.