Railyard MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Railyard MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceFacilitates project management with the Linear API via the Model Context Protocol, allowing users to manage initiatives, projects, issues, and their relationships through features like creation, viewing, updating, and prioritization.695 npm6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceManages software project specifications with AI-powered guided creation, querying, validation, and dependency analysis through the Model Context Protocol.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to Linear's issue tracking system through a standardized Model Context Protocol interface, allowing users to create, update, search, and manage issues, projects, and comments via natural language.401 npm1MIT

FrameOn MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access and update shared team project context—tasks, documents, decisions, and time tracking—through the Model Context Protocol.MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Linear's API for managing issues, teams, and projects programmatically through the Model Context Protocol.783 npm3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables interaction with the Edgee API for managing organizations, projects, domains, components, users, invitations, and API tokens through the Model Context Protocol.90 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct resource and action—org, project, member, invite, billing, catalog/roles, validation/export—so there is little risk of selecting the wrong one. The only close pair, list_invites and list_my_invites, is clearly differentiated by scope (org-owned vs token user's).
The vast majority follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_projects, set_member_role, accept_invite). Exceptions like whoami, server_info, and especially billing_manage_url break the pattern without causing real confusion.
At 31 tools, this sits well beyond the 25+ threshold for a single server and will require agents to manage a large option set. The broad API scope explains the size, but it is still heavier than ideal for an MCP tool surface.
The server covers full lifecycle CRUD for organisations and projects, plus membership/invitation management, org-level catalog/roles, billing, validation, and export. I don't see obvious dead ends: writes have matching reads, destructive operations have guards, and the billing flow links out to Stripe where needed.