Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Prismic Content MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables policy-aware access to the Productive.io API v2 for managing projects, tasks, time tracking, resource planning, financials, CRM, and reports, with safe defaults and staged writes for sensitive operations.
      12
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents like Claude, Cursor, and VS Code to read and write Notion content through a token-authenticated connection, covering pages, databases, blocks, comments, and file uploads. It supports headless and CI use with context-efficient tooling, batched mutations, and idempotent retries.
      4,610 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides complete access to the HubSpot API (1,076 tools) with safety categories, hub and plan awareness, retries, rate limiting, and both stdio and HTTP transports.
      12 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and clients to discover accounts and channels, read scheduling and analytics data, and manage posts, content items, and templates through 41 GraphQL-backed tools with private credential profiles and confirmation-gated mutations.
      41
      27 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Gives AI agents access to a persistent document workspace, letting them search, read, and update notes, guides, and project documentation across a full catalog of tools, prompts, and resources. It connects either to the hosted Cloud endpoint over Streamable HTTP with OAuth or API-key auth, or to a self-hosted instance through a stdio bridge.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific Prismic resources and operations. The naming convention (prismic_ + verb + noun) combined with detailed descriptions eliminates ambiguity between similar-sounding tools like prismic_get_document vs prismic_get_documents or prismic_insert_custom_type vs prismic_update_custom_type.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a perfect prismic_verb_noun pattern with consistent snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and systematic, making it easy to understand what each tool does based on its name alone.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a comprehensive content management system interface. The tools cover multiple domains (documents, custom types, shared slices, media, refs, releases) which justifies the number, though some consolidation might be possible.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides complete CRUD coverage for all major Prismic entities: documents (get, list, upsert), custom types (get, list, insert, update), shared slices (get, list, insert, update), media (add, list), plus essential supporting operations for refs, releases, and repository context. There are no obvious gaps for content management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues