Skip to main content
Glama
rahulpowar

Prismic Content MCP

by rahulpowar
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Prismic Content MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-server-productive

      borgels
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables policy-aware access to the Productive.io API v2 for managing projects, tasks, time tracking, resource planning, financials, CRM, and reports, with safe defaults and staged writes for sensitive operations.
      12
      Apache 2.0

    • HubSpot MCP

      ohneben
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides complete access to the HubSpot API (1,076 tools) with safety categories, hub and plan awareness, retries, rate limiting, and both stdio and HTTP transports.
      5 npm
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Strapi Server

      devlitus
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables CRUD operations, content management, and media handling for any Strapi content type through standardized tools. Supports internationalization, schema management, and works with Strapi v5's API.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific Prismic resources and operations. The naming convention (prismic_ + verb + noun) combined with detailed descriptions eliminates ambiguity between similar-sounding tools like prismic_get_document vs prismic_get_documents or prismic_insert_custom_type vs prismic_update_custom_type.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a perfect prismic_verb_noun pattern with consistent snake_case throughout. The naming is predictable and systematic, making it easy to understand what each tool does based on its name alone.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for a comprehensive content management system interface. The tools cover multiple domains (documents, custom types, shared slices, media, refs, releases) which justifies the number, though some consolidation might be possible.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides complete CRUD coverage for all major Prismic entities: documents (get, list, upsert), custom types (get, list, insert, update), shared slices (get, list, insert, update), media (add, list), plus essential supporting operations for refs, releases, and repository context. There are no obvious gaps for content management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources