Skip to main content
Glama
rahulkr
by rahulkr

list_devices

Retrieve details of all connected Android devices for development, testing, and debugging workflows.

Instructions

List all connected Android devices with details

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function for the 'list_devices' tool. It is decorated with @mcp.tool() which registers it with the FastMCP server. The function executes `adb devices -l` via the run_adb helper to list connected Android devices with details.
    @mcp.tool()
    def list_devices() -> str:
        """List all connected Android devices with details"""
        return run_adb(["devices", "-l"])
  • Helper function used by list_devices to execute ADB commands safely, handling errors, timeouts, and device selection.
    def run_adb(args: list[str], device_serial: str | None = None, timeout: int = 30) -> str:
        """Run an ADB command and return output"""
        cmd = ["adb"]
        if device_serial:
            cmd.extend(["-s", device_serial])
        cmd.extend(args)
        
        try:
            result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=timeout)
            if result.returncode != 0 and result.stderr:
                return f"Error: {result.stderr}"
            return result.stdout
        except subprocess.TimeoutExpired:
            return "Error: Command timed out"
        except Exception as e:
            return f"Error: {str(e)}"
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the action ('List all connected Android devices with details') but doesn't explain what 'details' include, whether this is a read-only operation, if it requires specific permissions, or how it handles multiple devices. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this is a significant gap in transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose without any wasted words. It is appropriately sized for a simple listing tool, making it easy for an agent to parse and understand quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 0 parameters, 100% schema coverage, and an output schema exists, the description is minimally complete. However, with no annotations and many sibling tools, it lacks context on behavior and usage, which could hinder agent selection. It meets basic requirements but has clear gaps in guidance and transparency.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description doesn't add parameter information, which is appropriate here, but it could have clarified output semantics (though an output schema exists). Baseline is 4 for zero parameters, as the description doesn't need to compensate for any gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb ('List') and resource ('connected Android devices with details'), making the purpose specific and understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like 'get_device_info' or 'get_screen_specs', which might also provide device-related information, so it misses full sibling differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools that interact with devices (e.g., 'get_device_info', 'list_packages'), there is no indication of context, prerequisites, or exclusions for usage, leaving the agent to infer based on tool names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rahulkr/r_adb_mcp_server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server