Skip to main content
Glama
ragubaran
by ragubaran

Related Servers

Alternatives to project-advisors-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides audit and safety-check tools for enterprise SDLC code integrity, enabling AI agents to scan workspaces for lifecycle gaps, mock-theater tests, DRY violations, and language-specific issues in shell, JavaScript/HTML, and Python.
      4
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates SAST, DAST, and SCA security tools to enable AI-driven vulnerability scanning and automated security reporting. It allows AI assistants to execute and analyze results from tools like Semgrep, OWASP ZAP, and Trivy within a DevSecOps workflow.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides tools for architecture analysis, risk diagnosis, quality metrics, and regression guarding to support AI-driven code review and incremental refactoring workflows.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI coding assistants to audit repositories against engineering rules, generating self-contained HTML reports with citations and optional GitHub issue filing.
      10
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that builds a dependency graph of your codebase, giving AI agents structural understanding to analyze impact, find context, and make safe modifications across languages and infrastructure.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct concern (dependencies, endpoints, runtime telemetry, MCP design, architecture, REST APIs, security config), but some overlap exists between security scan, vulnerability scan, and pentest scan. Descriptions clarify boundaries, so misselection is unlikely but possible.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Six of seven tools follow the 'run_*_scan' pattern, which is predictable and consistent. The outlier 'get_telemetry_stream' uses a different verb and noun style, creating a minor deviation but not causing confusion.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well within the ideal range for a specialized scanning server. Each tool covers a distinct aspect of project advisory, and the count feels neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main advisory domains: dependencies, security config, architecture, REST APIs, and runtime telemetry. Minor gaps like container scanning or infrastructure checks exist, but the core workflows are well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues