Skip to main content
Glama

gridstack_batch_update

Enable batch update mode to optimize performance when making multiple widget or layout changes in GridStack.js dashboards.

Instructions

Enable/disable batch update mode for efficiency

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
flagNoEnable (true) or disable (false) batch mode

Implementation Reference

  • The handler function that implements the core logic for the 'gridstack_batch_update' tool. It extracts the 'flag' parameter and generates a JavaScript code snippet calling GridStack's batchUpdate method.
    private async batchUpdate(params: BatchUpdateParams): Promise<string> {
      const { flag = true } = params;
    
      return this.utils.generateGridStackCode("batchUpdate", {
        flag,
        code: `grid.batchUpdate(${flag});`,
      });
    }
  • The tool definition including name, description, and input schema for 'gridstack_batch_update' as returned by listTools().
    {
      name: "gridstack_batch_update",
      description: "Enable/disable batch update mode for efficiency",
      inputSchema: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          flag: {
            type: "boolean",
            description: "Enable (true) or disable (false) batch mode",
            default: true,
          },
        },
      },
    },
  • The switch case in callTool() method that routes calls to the batchUpdate handler.
    case "gridstack_batch_update":
      return this.batchUpdate(args as BatchUpdateParams);
  • TypeScript interface defining the input parameters for the batchUpdate handler, matching the inputSchema.
    export interface BatchUpdateParams {
      flag?: boolean;
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the tool enables/disables a mode for efficiency, but doesn't explain what 'batch update mode' entails (e.g., delays rendering, batches multiple changes), potential side effects (e.g., performance impact, need to disable after use), or error conditions. This leaves significant gaps in understanding the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, consisting of a single, clear sentence: 'Enable/disable batch update mode for efficiency.' Every word earns its place by conveying the core action and benefit without any redundancy or unnecessary detail, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a mode-setting tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on what 'batch update mode' does, when to enable/disable it, efficiency trade-offs, and expected outcomes. For a tool that likely affects performance or behavior of other operations, more context is needed to use it effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with the 'flag' parameter clearly documented as enabling or disabling batch mode. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, such as usage examples or context for the boolean choice. Given the high schema coverage, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate, as the description doesn't compensate but also doesn't detract.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Enable/disable batch update mode for efficiency.' It specifies the action (enable/disable) and the target (batch update mode), with a clear efficiency benefit. However, it doesn't differentiate from siblings like 'gridstack_update_widget' or 'gridstack_save' that might also involve updates, leaving room for ambiguity in tool selection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions 'efficiency' but doesn't specify scenarios (e.g., before multiple widget operations) or exclusions (e.g., not needed for single updates). With many sibling tools for grid operations, this lack of context makes it hard for an agent to decide appropriately.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/raghavsharma-simpplr/gridstack-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server