Skip to main content
Glama
raghavharness

remote-shell-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to remote-shell-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to maintain persistent SSH terminal sessions and transfer files to/from remote servers. Allows stateful command execution, natural language server management, and seamless file operations through SSH connections.
      5 npm
      37
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to have persistent, fully interactive SSH sessions into remote hosts, behaving like a local terminal.
      9 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to establish and manage persistent SSH sessions, supporting smart command execution, async tasks, multi-host, sudo, and file operations through SFTP.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes persistent, stateful remote Bash sessions to AI agents via SSH, enabling command execution with preserved working directory and environment.
      7
      27 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to execute SSH commands and transfer files to and from remote servers, supporting remote server management and seamless session transfer to a VPS.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely execute commands on remote hosts via SSH and SFTP, with persistent shells, file transfers, screenshots, and an audit log.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 56 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The `shell` tool is described as the primary tool for remote commands and session control, but it overlaps heavily with `remote_session_start`, `remote_session_end`, `remote_session_signal`, and `remote_session_output`. Several session inspection tools (`remote_session_history`, `remote_session_output`, `remote_session_search`, `remote_session_errors`) also have fuzzy boundaries. An agent would struggle to decide whether to use `shell` or a dedicated `remote_session_*` tool in many situations.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a `remote_<resource>_<action>` pattern, but the `shell` tool breaks it by not having a `remote_` prefix. There are also minor inconsistencies in pluralization (e.g., `remote_blocks_list` vs `remote_block_get`, `remote_shares_list` vs `remote_session_*`). Overall the pattern is readable but not fully uniform.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 56 tools, this server is heavily overweight. While the domain covers many features (sessions, files, ports, blocks, panes, sharing, swarms, streaming), the granularity is excessive. For example, there are 7 separate pane tools and 8 swarm tools, which feels bloated. A more concise set of 15-20 tools would likely cover the same functionality with less confusion.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is exceptionally complete for a remote shell server. It covers session lifecycle, file transfer, port forwarding, command history, multi-pane management, session sharing, swarm operations, and streaming/error detection. There are no obvious missing operations; it even provides specialized input methods for prompts, passwords, and confirmations.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues