Skip to main content
Glama
rafiulislam4246

RECON

RECON — AI Research Engine That Finds What Others Miss

Free alternative to Perplexity Pro, Elicit, Consensus, SciSpace

Stars License Python MCP Updated

One command. YouTube, papers, podcasts — scored, filtered, and loaded into a queryable NotebookLM notebook.


What This Does

One command:

research("prompt engineering techniques", sources=["youtube", "papers"])

What happens:

  1. Searches YouTube (25 candidates), OpenAlex (474M papers), Podcast Index

  2. Grabs transcripts and scores them for substance — hedging language, failure discussion, specific data

  3. Scores channel credibility — clickbait detection, upload consistency, description depth

  4. Auto-searches for contrarian viewpoints (criticism, limitations, risks)

  5. Selects top sources across all types, creates a NotebookLM notebook

  6. Updates your knowledge graph — connects concepts across sessions

  7. Registers in the feedback loop — learns which channels actually produce results

Next research session? The system already knows what worked last time.


Related MCP server: NotebookLM MCP Server

Why Not Just Use Perplexity?

Feature

Perplexity Pro

Elicit

RECON

Source scoring

No — shows top results

Citation count only

8-factor scoring (substance, credibility, engagement, recency, velocity, relevance, transcript, feedback)

Transcript analysis

No

No

Analyzes what the speaker actually said — hedging, failures, specificity

Clickbait detection

No

N/A

Penalizes ALL CAPS titles, sensational language, empty descriptions

Knowledge graph

No

No

Connects concepts across sessions, finds gaps, suggests next research

Feedback loop

No

No

Tracks which sources produced real results — boosts them in future searches

Expert mode

No

No

Inverts popularity scoring to find practitioners over influencers

NotebookLM integration

No

No

Creates queryable notebooks you can have conversations with

Contrarian search

No

No

Auto-searches for criticism and opposing viewpoints

Cost

$20/month

$10/month

$0/month


Expert Mode

Most research tools find you popular content. Popular = mainstream consensus. RECON has an expert mode that inverts popularity scoring to find practitioners instead of influencers:

Signal

General Mode

Expert Mode

Views

High views = good

5K-50K sweet spot (practitioners, not mainstream)

Velocity

Trending = surface first

Removed entirely (trending = consensus)

Transcript

14% weight

24% weight (substance over hype)

Credibility

9% weight

20% weight (practitioners over influencers)

Engagement

Like ratio

Like ratio (same — honest signal either way)

The thesis: a 12K-view video from someone who discusses what went wrong and cites specific data is worth more than a 500K-view video that says "this technique is GUARANTEED to work."

research("RAG architecture", mode="expert", sources=["youtube", "papers"])

Architecture

research("prompt engineering")
         |
    +----+--------------------+
    v                         v
[YouTube API]           [OpenAlex API]          [Podcast Index]
 25 videos               20 papers               20 episodes
    |                         |                       |
    v                         v                       v
[Transcript              [Paper                  [Podcast
 Analyzer]                Scorer]                  Scorer]
 - substance              - citations             - episode count
 - hedging                - open access           - regularity
 - failures               - journal tier          - description
 - specificity            - recency               - relevance
    |                         |                       |
    +----+--------------------+-----------------------+
         v
[Credibility Scorer]
 - clickbait detection (45%)
 - upload consistency (25%)
 - description substance (20%)
 - channel age (10%)
         |
         v
[Contrarian Search]
 - auto-searches "topic + criticism/problems/risks"
 - reserves 1 slot for the best opposing viewpoint
         |
         v
[Top N Sources Selected]
         |
    +----+----+
    v         v
[NotebookLM]  [Knowledge Graph]
 notebook       entities
 created        edges
    |            |
    +----+-------+
         v
[Feedback Loop]          [Outcome Tracker]
 learns which             tracks which research
 channels work            produced real results

9 MCP Tools

Tool

What It Does

research

Full pipeline: multi-source search, notebook creation, graph update

search_videos

YouTube search with transcript + credibility scoring

search_papers

OpenAlex academic paper search (free, 474M+ papers)

list_research_notebooks

List all auto-created NotebookLM notebooks

rate_research

Rate a notebook 1-5 — feeds back into future scoring

suggest_research

AI-suggested topics from knowledge graph gaps

knowledge_map

Visualize concept connections across all research

track_edge

Record whether research produced real results

edge_report

ROI report — which sources/channels actually deliver


Substance Detection

Most YouTube scoring looks at views and likes. RECON looks at what the person actually said.

Three signals that are hard to fake in a 20-minute video:

1. Hedging Language (30% of substance score)

Nuanced thinkers acknowledge complexity:

"on the other hand", "it depends", "the tradeoff", "there are exceptions", "context matters"

2. Failure Discussion (35% — heaviest factor)

Practitioners talk about what went wrong:

"doesn't work when", "the risk is", "I was wrong", "lesson learned", "the hard way"

3. Specificity (35%)

Grounded speakers cite data:

Years, percentages, dollar amounts, "according to", "research shows", "study found"

A video can have 1M views and perfect engagement but still score low on substance if the speaker never hedges, never discusses failures, and never cites specific data.


Credibility Scoring

What got dropped: Self-reported credentials. Anyone can type "10 years experience" in their channel description. Meaningless.

What replaced it:

Factor

Weight

Why

Clickbait Detection

45%

Most honest signal. "GUARANTEED RESULTS" is unfakeable garbage.

Upload Consistency

25%

Regular uploads over years = committed to the craft

Description Substance

20%

Length + specificity (URLs, dates, contact info)

Channel Age

10%

Weak signal — punishes early adopters of new topics

Red flags that trigger penalties:

  • Channel under 3 months old

  • Fewer than 10 videos

  • 30%+ clickbait titles

  • 50%+ ALL CAPS titles

  • Empty channel description


Knowledge Graph

Every research session extracts entities (topics, concepts, channels, authors) and links them.

After 5+ sessions, the graph reveals:

  • Knowledge Gaps — concepts that keep appearing but haven't been researched directly

  • Cross-Domain Insights — entities that bridge different research areas (e.g., "embeddings" appears in both NLP AND image generation research)

  • Bridge Concepts — central nodes that connect many topics in your expertise

  • Stale Notebooks — time-sensitive research decays in 14 days, general in 30

suggest_research()
  -> "You've researched 'RAG' 3 times — go deeper"
  -> "'vector databases' appears across 4 notebooks but was never researched directly"
  -> "'embeddings' bridges NLP and computer vision research — cross-domain opportunity"
  -> "Research on 'LLM fine-tuning' is 18 days old — URGENT: refresh"

Outcome Tracker

The feedback loop most research tools are missing:

Research -> Implement -> Results -> Better Research

After you implement something from a research notebook:

track_edge(notebook_id="research-rag-architecture", result="edge", notes="New chunking strategy improved retrieval accuracy 23%")

The system learns:

  • Which channels produce real results (boosted in future searches)

  • Which topics have high success rates (surfaced first in suggestions)

  • Which source types deliver (YouTube vs papers vs podcasts)

  • Overall research ROI — what % of sessions produced actionable insights

edge_report()
  -> "3Blue1Brown: 3/4 sessions produced results (75%)"
  -> "AI topic success rate: 42% (above average)"
  -> "YouTube delivers 2x more actionable content than papers for applied topics"

Setup

1. Clone and install

git clone https://github.com/itsjwill/RECON.git
cd RECON
python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -e .

2. Environment variables

cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env:
YOUTUBE_API_KEY=your_key_here  # https://console.cloud.google.com/apis/credentials

YouTube API key is the only requirement. OpenAlex (papers) needs no key. Podcast Index is optional.

3. Add to Claude Code MCP config

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "auto-research": {
      "command": "/path/to/RECON/.venv/bin/python",
      "args": ["-m", "src.server"],
      "cwd": "/path/to/RECON"
    }
  }
}

4. Use it

research("prompt engineering techniques", sources=["youtube", "papers"])

Cost

Component

Cost

YouTube Data API

Free (10,000 units/day)

OpenAlex Papers

Free (no key, 100K req/day)

Transcripts

Free (youtube-transcript-api)

NotebookLM

Free (Google account)

Podcast Index

Free (optional, needs registration)

Total

$0/month


File Structure

RECON/
├── src/
│   ├── server.py            # MCP server — 9 tools
│   ├── config.py            # Environment + settings
│   ├── youtube_search.py    # YouTube API + 8-factor scoring + expert mode
│   ├── transcript.py        # Transcript extraction + substance detection
│   ├── credibility.py       # Channel credibility (clickbait, consistency)
│   ├── paper_search.py      # OpenAlex academic paper search
│   ├── podcast_search.py    # Podcast Index search
│   ├── notebook_manager.py  # NotebookLM browser automation
│   ├── library_sync.py      # Shared library.json management
│   ├── feedback.py          # Usage tracking + stale detection
│   ├── knowledge_graph.py   # Cross-notebook entity graph
│   └── edge_tracker.py      # Research outcome tracking
├── data/
│   ├── knowledge_graph.json # Entity graph (auto-created)
│   └── feedback.json        # Usage data (auto-created)
├── pyproject.toml
├── requirements.txt
├── .env.example             # API key template
└── .env                     # Your API keys (not committed)

Join The Community

Built by the team at The Agentic Advantage

Get help setting up RECON, share research workflows, and connect with other builders using AI tools that actually work.


More From itsjwill

Repo

What It Does

vanta

Open source AI video engine — voice cloning, AI avatars, auto-captions

seoctopus

8-armed SEO intelligence — MCP server with 23 tools

ghosthacker

Adversarial AI pentester — CHAOS vs ORDER dual-agent system

claude-memory

Persistent memory for Claude Code — auto-capture decisions and patterns


Built for finding what matters, not collecting bookmarks.

F
license - not found
-
quality - not tested
D
maintenance

Maintenance

Maintainers
Response time
Release cycle
Releases (12mo)
Commit activity

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables interaction with Google NotebookLM through natural language to create and manage notebooks, add sources from URLs/YouTube/Google Drive, perform AI-powered research and analysis, generate audio podcasts, videos, infographics, and slide decks from notebook content.
    32
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Enables interaction with Google's NotebookLM through natural language to create and manage notebooks, add sources from URLs/YouTube/Drive, perform AI-powered research and analysis, and generate audio overviews, videos, infographics, and slide decks from research content.
    32
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables searching and analyzing over 560,000 CS/AI/ML research papers with LLM-powered novelty scoring and summaries. Supports literature reviews, trend monitoring, benchmark tracking, and deep research sessions through 23 specialized tools.
    25
    235
    10
    MIT

View all related MCP servers

Related MCP Connectors

  • Google NotebookLM via natural language: create notebooks, add sources (PDF, URL, YouTube) and ask gr

  • Web research for agents: quality-scored Google search, webpage extraction, and deep research.

  • Search arXiv/Semantic Scholar/OpenAlex + medical evidence (PubMed/Europe PMC) + LaTeX/PDF tools.

View all MCP Connectors

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rafiulislam4246/recon-by-rafiul'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server