Skip to main content
Glama
rafin0906

google-flow-mcp-server

by rafin0906
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to google-flow-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • playwright-fixer-mcp

      BobChochola
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Automated Playwright E2E test repair powered by a self-improving, governed MCP server that runs failing tests, collects failure artifacts, reasons about root causes, validates and applies fixes, and re-runs to verify.
      12
      -

    • FlowPilot MCP Server

      Rocco3D
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants such as Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor to generate images and videos through Google Flow using a local, already signed-in Chrome session. It runs as a local MCP endpoint so assistants can submit generation jobs, manage them, and receive results using your own Flow subscription credits.
      1
      MIT

    • capcut-mcp

      yabdulaziz2009-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that assembles CapCut International projects by reading and writing local project files, adding captions, subtitles, overlays, and more so editors start with a mostly-done timeline. It includes tools for inspecting projects, restyling captions, importing subtitles, and rendering alpha-channel overlays via Remotion.
      8
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Give agents eyes on the webHosted screenshot MCP. Send a URL, get a pixel-perfect image. $0.002 per grab. Works with Claude, Cursor, and Codex.grabbit.liveAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct step in the poster workflow: create_project sets up a project, generate_poster creates from scratch, edit_poster refines an existing image, and poster_ratio_editor specifically adjusts aspect ratio. There is minor overlap between edit_poster and ratio_editor, but descriptions clarify the difference.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Three tools follow a verb_noun pattern (create_project, generate_poster, edit_poster), while poster_ratio_editor uses a noun_noun pattern with 'editor' at the end. The tool_ prefix is consistent, but the deviation in the last tool's pattern makes it slightly inconsistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for a specific poster generation and editing workflow. Each tool serves a distinct purpose in the pipeline, and the count feels appropriate without being excessive or thin.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core lifecycle of creating a project, generating a poster, editing it, and adjusting its ratio. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no delete or listing tool), but the primary workflow is fully supported and agents can complete the intended tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources