Skip to main content
Glama
rafaljanicki

X (Twitter) MCP server

by rafaljanicki

Related Servers

Alternatives to X (Twitter) MCP server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables posting tweets, reading timelines, searching posts, and interacting with X (Twitter) API.
      9 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for X (Twitter) that enables creating posts, threads, likes, follows, and DMs, plus reading posts, timelines, mentions, and search results via a unified OAuth 2.0 connection.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for interacting with X/Twitter, enabling posting tweets, searching, user info, timeline, liking, retweeting, and deleting tweets.
      7
      10 npm
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for interacting with the X platform (Twitter) via MCP clients like Claude, Cursor AI, and Windsurf AI.
      20
      9 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server to read X (Twitter) posts, threads, replies, quotes, and search using your own logged-in session, no API key required.
      8
      34 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A minimal MCP server for posting tweets to X (Twitter) via API v2, supporting tweet creation, replies, and quote tweets.
      1
      13 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific resources and actions, such as get_user_by_id vs. get_user_by_screen_name for user lookup, and bookmark_tweet vs. favorite_tweet for engagement. However, there is some overlap between get_latest_timeline and get_timeline, which both retrieve home timeline tweets with only subtle differences ('Following' vs. 'For You'), potentially causing confusion for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as get_user_by_id, delete_tweet, and post_tweet. All names use snake_case uniformly, and verbs like 'get', 'create', 'delete', and 'post' are applied predictably across similar resources, making the set easy to navigate and understand.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 23 tools, the count is on the higher side for a Twitter API server, bordering on heavy but still within a reasonable scope given the platform's complexity. It covers many aspects like tweets, users, and engagement, but may feel slightly bloated compared to a more streamlined set of 10-15 core tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for core Twitter operations, including CRUD for tweets (post, delete), user lookup (by ID, screen name), engagement (favorite, bookmark), and timelines. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tools for managing lists or sending direct messages, but agents can work around these with the available tools for most common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues