Skip to main content
Glama

publishServiceBinding

Publish a service binding to an SAP ABAP system via ADT API, requiring name and version. Optionally specify a connection for the call.

Instructions

Publishes a service binding.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesThe name of the service binding.
versionYesThe version of the service binding.
connectionNoOptional: SAP connection name to use for THIS call only (overrides the active connection; see listConnections). Immune to server restarts and concurrent switches.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It merely states 'Publishes' without disclosing behavioral traits such as overwrite behavior, authorization requirements, side effects, or return values.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (three words, one sentence) but at the expense of missing critical context. It is front-loaded with the verb but lacks structure to convey necessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters (one optional), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It does not explain the publishing process, return values, or error conditions, which is inadequate for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema parameter descriptions, which already cover 'name,' 'version,' and 'connection' adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'publishes' and the resource 'service binding,' which is distinct from the sibling tool 'unPublishServiceBinding.' However, it does not elaborate on what 'publishing' means in this context (e.g., makes the binding available for consumption).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The sibling 'unPublishServiceBinding' is present but not mentioned. Prerequisites or conditions for publishing are absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/rafaelssclaudio/MCP'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server