Skip to main content
Glama
mcp-server-autocad-lisp-helper

mcp-server-autocad-lisp-helper

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-server-autocad-lisp-helper

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local static analysis of AI deployment artifacts, producing SHA-256 hashes, serialized structure, defects, cautions, evidence gaps, and limitations without executing model code.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic static analysis of Python code, providing tools to inspect classes, functions, imports, dependencies, and more, without executing the code.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to submit code files for analysis and receive rule-based findings with severities, line numbers, and SARIF fingerprints, covering security, complexity, and dependency/configuration drift.
      446 PyPI
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides deep structural analysis of Python source code via AST, including function signatures, call graphs, cyclomatic complexity, code smells, dead code detection, and protocol conformance.
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables local code inspection and analysis for clean code practices, best practices, and actionable recommendations without external API calls or modifying the code.
      82 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for static code analysis using AST parsing and linters, providing tools to detect syntax errors, type issues, typos, and incorrect variable usage across multiple languages. It supports headless linting with tools like ast_check, lint_check, and health.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct analysis concern: structural syntax validation, function/variable extraction, and cleanup/state-leakage checking. Although all three operate on AutoLISP source statically, the descriptions draw sharp boundaries so an agent can select correctly with no overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three names follow a strict verb_noun snake_case pattern (analyze_..., extract_..., check_...). The convention is uniform and self-describing, with no mixed casing or verb styles.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three focused tools is at the low end of the typical 3-15 range but each earns its place for a narrow lint-style helper. It is not bloated, though the surface feels slightly thin for a full AutoLISP assistance workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core static-analysis lifecycle for AutoLISP: syntax validation, symbol/function extraction, and cleanup-state auditing. Minor gaps exist around remediation (auto-fix/format) or deeper cross-reference/usage analysis, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues