Skip to main content
Glama
raditotev

AgentTrust

by raditotev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to AgentTrust

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Creditcoin Reputation MCP

      ikemeanthony40-collab
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to look up on-chain trust data for any Ethereum-compatible wallet address, returning verified, estimated and total scores plus a reputation tier. It serves this through a single self-hosted Streamable HTTP endpoint at /mcp, supporting session handling, tool discovery and tool invocation.
      21 npm
      MIT

    • trust-mcp

      BillyTheManBot
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to verify each other's trust scores, register, submit reviews, and find trusted agents before transacting.
      4
      10 npm
      MIT

    • TrustMesh MCP Server

      Clioloop
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with trust scoring and reputation management capabilities for secure interactions. Enables agents to check trust scores, rate interactions, and manage disputes before transacting with other agents.
      -

    • trust-mcp

      Schmoll86
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent trust verification, enabling agents to verify identities, check trust scores, and build reputation across multiple blockchain and web platforms.
      12
      10 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 23 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose, from registration and authentication to trust checking, interaction reporting, disputes, attestations, linking, and sybil detection. No two tools overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., check_trust, report_interaction, issue_attestation). However, a few deviate (e.g., agent_status, whoami, discover), preventing a perfect score.

    Tool Count4/5

    23 tools is slightly above the typical 3-15 range for a well-scoped server, but the comprehensive nature of a trust network service justifies the count. It is not excessive or thin.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of trust management: registration, authentication, trust querying, interaction reporting, confirmation, disputes, attestations, linking, search, and sybil detection. Only minor gaps like attestation revocation are missing.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources