list_webhooks

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does disclose the auth scoping ('authenticated RaceHooks account'), but says nothing about pagination defaults, result ordering, or what a webhook record contains — despite limit/offset parameters implying a paged result.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with zero filler, and the resource and scope are front-loaded. Nothing could be cut, and nothing extraneous is included.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only list tool with no output schema, the purpose is fully covered, but the absence of any pagination or result-shape information leaves an agent without what it needs to page correctly or know what fields to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for the two undocumented parameters, and it does not mention limit or offset at all. The schema supplies defaults and min/max bounds but no semantics, leaving the agent to guess whether pagination is expected or whether all webhooks are returned in one shot.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('List') plus resource ('webhook subscriptions') and scope ('for the authenticated RaceHooks account'). The plural 'all' implicitly distinguishes it from the sibling get_webhook, but no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: 'List all' suggests enumeration/overview versus the single-resource get_webhook, but the description never says when to reach for this versus get_webhook, get_webhook_logs, or get_webhook_secret. No exclusions or prerequisites are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.