Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to DocGuard

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that indexes Markdown, Word, HTML, and PDF documents into a SQLite knowledge graph with CJK+Latin full-text search and cross-document reference tracking. Runs drift audits to surface stale policies, conflicting research claims, superseded ADRs, and undocumented code exports.
    10
    8
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A local MCP server that wraps the DocuGenerate API to generate documents (invoices, contracts, letters) from templates via natural language commands.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    An MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.
    30
    44 PyPI
    1
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Local documentation search server for AI models using hybrid retrieval (phrase, keyword, vector). Provides MCP tools to search and fetch documentation from bundled or custom doc sets without any external API keys.
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    MCP server that exposes one or more documentation folders (Markdown, MDX, TXT) to AI agents, enabling listing, reading, and searching of documentation files.
    -
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Local MCP server that extracts text and structure from PDF, DOCX, PPTX, SVG, and PNG files, along with directory and metadata listing, for read-only document analysis by LLM hosts.
    -

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a distinct output role—full guard run, actionable subset, explanation, report, score, evidence verification, and claim extraction. The only potential confusion is docguard_guard vs docguard_diagnose, but their descriptions clearly separate full JSON from fix-oriented results.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tools share the docguard_ prefix and use clear action verbs, but the pattern is not fully uniform: some are bare verbs (diagnose, explain, report, score, guard) while others use verb_noun (verify_evidence, verify_claims). docguard_guard is also slightly redundant, though the set remains predictable and readable.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well-scoped for a documentation-compliance utility; each tool addresses a distinct stage of the guard/report/verify workflow. No tool feels redundant, and the count is neither thin nor bloated.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the full read-only lifecycle: running validators, prioritizing fixes, explaining codes, scoring, reporting, and verifying both evidence files and semantic claims. Minor gaps like a validator-listing or configuration tool are possible, but agents can work around them using the guard output and explain tool.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive