get_network_mode
Retrieve the active network mode and discover available Neo networks on the blockchain.
Instructions
Get the active network mode and available Neo networks.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve the active network mode and discover available Neo networks on the blockchain.
Get the active network mode and available Neo networks.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic read operation. No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not mention authentication, rate limits, or whether the list of networks is complete or filtered.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose. No superfluous words or unnecessary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool is simple and the description covers the basics, it lacks details on the return format. Given the absence of an output schema, the description should ideally hint at the structure of the response (e.g., JSON fields) to help the agent parse results. Also, no contextual info on prerequisites or side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has no parameters, so the input schema covers 100% of the interface. The description adds value by specifying that it returns both the active mode and the available networks, which is meaningful context beyond the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the tool retrieves the active network mode and available Neo networks. Verb 'Get' and resource 'network mode' and 'Neo networks' are specific and unambiguous. It distinguishes from sibling 'set_network_mode'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. However, the purpose implies it is for reading network mode, and the sibling 'set_network_mode' handles writing, which provides indirect context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/r3e-network/neo-n3-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server