move_app_from_space

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses a critical behavioral trait: the system setting requirement, which is essential for successful invocation. However, it doesn't cover other aspects like permissions needed, whether the operation is reversible, error conditions, or what happens to the app after removal. It adds some value but leaves gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: one states the purpose, and the other provides a prerequisite note. It's front-loaded with the main action and avoids unnecessary fluff. However, it could be slightly more structured (e.g., separating usage notes).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no annotations, no output schema, and a simple single parameter, the description is moderately complete. It covers the purpose and a key prerequisite, but for a mutation tool (implied by 'move'), it lacks details on behavioral outcomes, error handling, or post-operation state. More context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the single parameter 'app_id' fully documented in the schema. The description doesn't add any parameter-specific details beyond what the schema provides (e.g., format constraints or examples). Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema handles parameter documentation adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('move app from space' or 'disassociate app from space') and specifies the resource (kintone app). It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'move_app_to_space' by implying the opposite operation, though not explicitly named. The purpose is specific but could be more precise about what 'move from space' entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a prerequisite note about system settings ('スペースに所属しないアプリの作成を許可する' must be enabled), which provides implicit guidance on when this tool can be used. However, it lacks explicit alternatives (e.g., when to use vs. other space-related tools) or clear exclusions. The context is implied but not comprehensive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.