Skip to main content
Glama
r28ai

recruiting-ops-mcp

by r28ai
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

gcalendar_events_insert

Create Google Calendar events for recruiting workflows, such as interview panels, by setting times, attendees, and details; returns the created event.

Instructions

Create a calendar event; returns details of the event.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
eventYesThe event to insert.
calendarIdYesCalendar identifier. To retrieve calendar IDs call the calendarList.list method. If you want to access the primary calendar of the currently logged in user, use the "primary" keyword.
sendUpdatesNoGuests who should receive notifications about the change. Acceptable values are: "all" (notifications are sent to all guests), "externalOnly" (notifications are sent to non-Google Calendar guests only), "none" (no notifications are sent; for calendar migration tasks, consider using the Events.import method instead).
maxAttendeesNoThe maximum number of attendees to include in the response. If there are more than the specified number of attendees, only the participant is returned. Optional.
eventLabelVersionNoVersion number of the event label feature supported by the API client. Version 0 assumes no event label support and processes the colorId field for color management. Version 1 enables support for event labels, and processes the eventLabelId in the event's body. In this case, the colorId field is ignored. The default is 0. Acceptable values are 0 to 1, inclusive.
supportsAttachmentsNoWhether API client performing operation supports event attachments. Optional. The default is False.
conferenceDataVersionNoVersion number of conference data supported by the API client. Version 0 assumes no conference data support and ignores conference data in the event's body. Version 1 enables support for copying of ConferenceData as well as for creating new conferences using the createRequest field of conferenceData. The default is 0. Acceptable values are 0 to 1, inclusive.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false (a mutation) and openWorldHint=true. The description adds only 'returns details of the event' and omits meaningful behavioral context for a mutation tool of this complexity: guest notifications, the sendUpdates/conferenceDataVersion/supportsAttachments side-effect flags, permission requirements, and attendee-invitation behavior are all undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with the action front-loaded and no filler. It is efficient, though the trailing return-value clause could arguably be dropped since it is the only content beyond the verb.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the brief note about returned details is helpful, but for a mutation tool with 7 parameters and rich side-effect potential (invitations, notifications, conference generation) the description is thin. It is minimally adequate rather than complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the input schema fully documents all 7 parameters including sendUpdates, conferenceDataVersion, and maxAttendees. Per the rubric, that establishes a baseline of 3; the description adds nothing beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Create a calendar event'), which clearly distinguishes it from the sibling gcalendar_events_list. It does not, however, differentiate itself from similar write operations or mention scope (which calendar), so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use context, prerequisites, or alternatives. An agent must infer that this is the creation counterpart to gcalendar_events_list without any explicit routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools