No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 61 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct provider+resource+action scopes, and descriptions often explicitly disambiguate near-neighbors (e.g. actions_list_jobs_for_run vs download_job_logs vs checks_list_annotations). However, several pairs overlap enough to risk misselection: github_pulls_get vs github_pulls_get_diff, github_repos_get_content vs github_repos_get_readme, and github_actions_list_workflow_runs vs github_actions_list_runs_for_workflow.
The dominant pattern is service_resource_action (e.g. github_pulls_list, linear_issue_create, notion_pages_create), which is predictable and readable. Minor deviations exist: connect and connection_status lack a service prefix, and GitHub Actions tools use variable ordering (actions_get_run_usage, actions_list_workflow_runs), but nothing is chaotic.
61 tools is far beyond the 15-tool well-scoped range and spans at least eight services (GitHub, Linear, Google Docs/Calendar/Sheets, Slack, Notion, Firecrawl, Tavily). Even for a multi-app integration server, this breadth creates heavy surface area and cognitive load, making selection harder than it needs to be.
Coverage is broad but shallow in critical areas. For a dev-workflow server, there is no GitHub issue creation or update, no PR merge operation, no Linear issue update/delete, no Slack channel listing, and Google Docs batch update is referenced in descriptions but not exposed as a tool, creating dead ends in core workflows.