Skip to main content
Glama
r-irbe

lean-lsp-mcp

by r-irbe

Related Servers

Alternatives to lean-lsp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to interact with the Lean theorem prover through the Language Server Protocol, providing tools for analyzing Lean projects, accessing diagnostics, goal states, documentation, and searching for theorems using both local and external search services.
      23
      268,888 PyPI
      513
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes type-aware code navigation and fast file search to AI agents via language servers, enabling definitions, references, symbols, and file lookup without reading entire codebases.
      1,077 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to perform local hybrid code search and code intelligence across a workspace, including semantic and full-text search, symbol lookup, file outlines, and caller analysis.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to efficiently understand and navigate a codebase by providing semantic search over symbols and a reference graph, replacing expensive grep/glob calls with structured tools like definition lookup, caller/callee queries, and change-impact analysis.
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides IDE-like code navigation and search for local repositories, enabling AI assistants to perform symbol search, trigram indexing, and semantic navigation.
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct concern: tactic proof state, term type inspection, symbol lookup, module dependency analysis, and C FFI inspection. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these operations, even the two goal-related tools are clearly differentiated by context.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a uniform pattern with the 'lean_' prefix and snake_case, using noun-based or verb-noun combinations consistently (e.g., lean_goal, lean_lookup_symbol). The naming is predictable and easy to infer purpose from.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for a Lean LSP integration, providing a focused set of capabilities without redundancy or bloat. Each tool serves a clear purpose in the interactive theorem proving workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers essential Lean-specific operations like goal queries and symbol lookup, but lacks common LSP features such as hover, diagnostics, or references. However, for a specialized Lean server, the core proving workflows are well-represented, with only minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues