Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to sci-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that exposes 8 mathematical tools (arithmetic, algebra, calculus, matrix operations, statistics, probability, unit conversions) to any MCP-compatible AI agent, enabling mathematical computations without code.
      8
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI models run code in 31 languages, evaluate symbolic math and logic problems, and measure complexity—exposed as 48 tools for execution, session management, translation, optimization, and more.
      51
      259 PyPI
      5
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A multi-tool MCP server that enhances local LLMs with web search, document reading, scholarly research, Wikipedia access, and calculator functions. Provides comprehensive tools for information retrieval and computation without requiring API keys by default.
      22
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects AI assistants to a local Wolfram Engine, enabling symbolic math, numerical analysis, and data visualization through Wolfram Language. It provides secure expression filtering, client authentication, and supports both local stdio and HTTP transports.
      2
      32
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A zero-dependency MCP and agent tool server for small local models that provides a measured, deterministic tool-calling interface with file, web, shell, and calculation tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes numerical and mathematical methods (root finding, integration, differentiation, ODEs, Monte Carlo, dynamic systems) as tools for LLM agents to call directly from chat clients.
      29
      8 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 65 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tool pairs have overlapping purposes (e.g., plot vs plot_file, describe vs describe_file, forecast vs arima, analyze_dataset vs component tools). Descriptions clarify file-based vs inline and general vs specific, but the volume of tools makes misselection likely. Most tools remain distinct enough for an expert agent.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tool names use snake_case consistently, but the verb style is mixed: many are verb_noun (load_data, solve_heat_1d), while others are noun-only (arima, gradient, distribution). This is readable but lacks a single predictable pattern.

    Tool Count1/5

    With 65 tools, the server far exceeds the recommended 3-15 range and even the 25+ threshold for 'too many'. While the scientific computing domain is broad, the tool count is excessive and likely to overwhelm an agent, with many tools that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a vast range of scientific computing tasks: data IO, statistics, PDE solvers, optimization, signal processing, symbolic math, and more. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no dedicated data manipulation tools), but run_python provides a workaround.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues