oh-my-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to oh-my-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server with over 50 tools across 7 categories including memory, AI/LLM, development, database, project management, cloud/deploy, and search/research.47-

onion-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA feature-rich MCP server offering 30 tools across AI, code, text, data, web, and system categories, enabling tasks like chat, translation, code review, web scraping, and text processing.30MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server with 30+ custom tools organized into categories: date/time operations, file management, system information, text processing, and web operations. Enables async communication with robust error handling and flexible CLI integration.311MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA MCP server for Windows/Linux that provides 90+ tools enabling AI assistants to systematically manage local systems, including system probing, command execution, file editing, network diagnostics, and more.14MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server providing 21+ tools for mathematical operations, string manipulation, file handling, utilities, and web requests via FastAPI and WebSocket.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables web searching, URL content extraction, and summarization without requiring API keys. It also provides advanced mathematical evaluation and multi-language Wikipedia summary retrieval tools.5266 npm6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 116 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, especially in the browser and subagent groups. However, there is some overlap between similar tools like fetch_webpage/fetch_webpage_text, parse_csv/csv_to_json, and multiple search tools (web_search, web_search_advanced, web_search_news). Descriptions help but some boundaries are blurry.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., browser_navigate, parse_csv, get_system_info). No mixed conventions or irregular naming, making the set predictable for an agent.
With 116 tools, the server is extremely large for an MCP server. While it aims to be a comprehensive toolkit, the sheer number likely overwhelms agents and increases selection errors. A more focused scope or modularization would improve coherence.
The tool set covers a wide range of domains (browser, file, text, system, web search, subagent) with good depth. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of in-place file editing or image processing, but overall the surface is quite complete for its stated purpose.