Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to oh-my-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server with 30+ custom tools organized into categories: date/time operations, file management, system information, text processing, and web operations. Enables async communication with robust error handling and flexible CLI integration.
      31
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A MCP server for Windows/Linux that provides 90+ tools enabling AI assistants to systematically manage local systems, including system probing, command execution, file editing, network diagnostics, and more.
      14
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing 21+ tools for mathematical operations, string manipulation, file handling, utilities, and web requests via FastAPI and WebSocket.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables web searching, URL content extraction, and summarization without requiring API keys. It also provides advanced mathematical evaluation and multi-language Wikipedia summary retrieval tools.
      5
      266 npm
      6
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 116 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, especially in the browser and subagent groups. However, there is some overlap between similar tools like fetch_webpage/fetch_webpage_text, parse_csv/csv_to_json, and multiple search tools (web_search, web_search_advanced, web_search_news). Descriptions help but some boundaries are blurry.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., browser_navigate, parse_csv, get_system_info). No mixed conventions or irregular naming, making the set predictable for an agent.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 116 tools, the server is extremely large for an MCP server. While it aims to be a comprehensive toolkit, the sheer number likely overwhelms agents and increases selection errors. A more focused scope or modularization would improve coherence.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers a wide range of domains (browser, file, text, system, web search, subagent) with good depth. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of in-place file editing or image processing, but overall the surface is quite complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues