ai-coord-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to ai-coord-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA coordination layer for coding agents that provides memorable identities, inbox/outbox messaging, searchable message history, and file lease management to prevent conflicts. Uses Git for human-auditable artifacts and SQLite for fast queries, enabling multiple agents to collaborate across projects without stepping on each other.2,152MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables multiple AI coding agents to coordinate on a shared software project by registering, claiming tasks, declaring file intents, publishing structured change reports, and handing off context, with a local dashboard showing state in near real time.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables two coding assistants to coordinate task creation, claiming, messages, and completion through a shared local workflow queue while using GitHub issues, branches, commits, and PRs as the source of truth.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local coordination layer that enables multiple AI coding agents to share context, task leases, file ownership, and decisions via MCP tools, preventing repeated work and allowing seamless handoffs.19Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA coordination layer for coding agents that provides identities, message threading, and searchable history. It features file reservation leases to prevent agents from overwriting each other's work in multi-agent environments.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA lightweight coordination layer for multiple AI agents working on the same codebase, providing check-in and check-out tools via STDIO or Streamable HTTP.45 npm1Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource/action: task CRUD, claiming, lifecycle transitions (complete/cancel/reopen/approve/revision), messaging, progress, and waiting. Even similar tools like list_tasks/search_tasks and claim_task/claim_next_task are clearly differentiated by purpose and described behavior.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (create_task, get_task, claim_task, update_progress, wait_for_task). Verb choices are semantically aligned with actions (list/get/search for reads; claim/complete/cancel for state changes), making the set predictable and easy to navigate.
At 16 tools, the set sits at the upper boundary of typical scope, but every tool serves a distinct purpose in the coordination workflow. The slightly elevated count is justified by the inclusion of specialized tools like claim_next_task and wait_for_task that optimize common operations.
The surface covers the full task lifecycle (create, read, claim, complete, cancel, reopen, approve, revision) plus messaging and progress tracking. Minor gaps exist: there's no tool to edit task metadata (e.g., title, description, assignee) after creation, but this can be worked around via cancel/recreate.