export_devices_csv

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description bears the full responsibility for disclosing behavioral effects. It states the action (export to CSV) but omits critical side effects, such as file creation, overwrite behavior, path requirements, or permission needs. Since this is a write operation, this is a major gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no fluff. It communicates the core action and destination efficiently, earning high marks for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of many sibling tools and a non-trivial write operation, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the 'handle' parameter, which is required, nor does it detail the expected 'out_path' format. The output schema exists, but parameter comprehension is still lacking.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must clarify both parameters. It only implies 'out_path' with 'по указанному пути', but never explains what 'handle' refers to (device list handle? plan handle?). No additional meaning beyond the raw schema names is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Выгрузить' - export), a resource ('плоский список устройств' - flat list of devices), and a format ('CSV'), along with an optional path qualifier. This clearly distinguishes it from other device-related tools like list_devices or search_devices, none of which mention file export.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is given on when to choose this tool over alternatives like list_devices or export variants. The phrase 'вне архива' hints at a specific use case but does not clarify when to use it or when not to. There is no mention of alternatives or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.