@qubaomingg/stock-mcp
Servidor MCP Alpha Vantage Stock
Este es un servidor de Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) que proporciona datos bursátiles desde la API de Alpha Vantage. Permite a Claude y a otros clientes de MCP acceder a datos bursátiles históricos y en tiempo real.
Características
Obtenga datos bursátiles intradiarios con intervalos personalizables
Obtenga datos bursátiles diarios
Generar alertas de stock basadas en movimientos de precios
Acceda a los datos bursátiles como recursos
Related MCP server: Stock Market MCP Server
Prerrequisitos
Node.js 16 o superior
Una clave API de Alpha Vantage (obtenga una gratis en Alpha Vantage )
Instalación
Clonar este repositorio
Instalar dependencias:
npm installCree un archivo
.enven el directorio raíz y agregue su clave API de Alpha Vantage:ALPHA_VANTAGE_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
Construyendo y funcionando
Construya el código TypeScript:
npm run buildEjecutar el servidor:
npm startPara desarrollo con recarga automática:
npm run devPruebe el cliente API:
npm testUso con Claude para escritorio
Para utilizar este servidor MCP con Claude for Desktop:
Abrir Claude para escritorio
Vaya a Configuración > Desarrollador > Editar configuración
Agregue lo siguiente a su
claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"alpha-vantage": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"ALPHA_VANTAGE_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY"
}
}
}
}Reemplace /absolute/path/to/dist/index.js con la ruta absoluta al archivo index.js creado.
Reiniciar Claude para escritorio
Herramientas disponibles
obtener datos de stock
Obtiene datos bursátiles intradiarios para un símbolo específico.
Parámetros:
symbol(obligatorio): Símbolo bursátil (p. ej., IBM, AAPL)interval(opcional): Intervalo de tiempo entre puntos de datos (1 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min). Valor predeterminado: 5 min.outputsize(opcional): Cantidad de datos a devolver (compacto: últimos 100 puntos de datos, completo: hasta 20 años de datos). Predeterminado: compacto
obtener datos bursátiles diarios
Obtiene datos diarios de acciones para un símbolo específico.
Parámetros:
symbol(obligatorio): Símbolo bursátil (p. ej., IBM, AAPL)outputsize(opcional): Cantidad de datos a devolver (compacto: últimos 100 puntos de datos, completo: hasta 20 años de datos). Predeterminado: compacto
obtener alertas de stock
Analiza datos bursátiles para generar alertas basadas en movimientos de precios.
Parámetros:
symbol(obligatorio): Símbolo bursátil (p. ej., IBM, AAPL)threshold(opcional): Umbral porcentual para alertas de movimiento de precios. Valor predeterminado: 5
Recursos disponibles
datos bursátiles
Acceda a los datos de stock directamente como recurso.
Plantilla de URI: stock://{symbol}/{interval}
Parámetros:
symbol: Símbolo bursátil (por ejemplo, IBM, AAPL)interval: Intervalo de tiempo (diario, 1 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min). Predeterminado: diario
Ejemplo de uso en Claude:
¿Puedes analizar estos datos bursátiles: stock://AAPL/daily?
¿Qué opinas de estos datos: stock://MSFT/5min?
Licencia
ISC
Available Tools
3 toolsget-daily-stock-dataD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| symbol | Yes | Stock symbol (e.g., IBM, AAPL) | |
| outputsize | No | Amount of data to return (compact: latest 100 data points, full: up to 20 years of data) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get-stock-alertsD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| symbol | Yes | Stock symbol (e.g., IBM, AAPL) | |
| threshold | No | Percentage threshold for price movement alerts (default: 5) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get-stock-dataD
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| symbol | Yes | Stock symbol (e.g., IBM, AAPL) | |
| interval | No | Time interval between data points (default: 5min) | |
| outputsize | No | Amount of data to return (compact: latest 100 data points, full: up to 20 years of data) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Tool has no description.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Tool has no description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has no description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Tool has no description.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Tool has no description.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
3 tool updates
v1.0.0- Changed
get-daily-stock-data2 fields changed- added
Input schema / $schemaAdded value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#" - added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false
- Changed
get-stock-alerts2 fields changed- added
Input schema / $schemaAdded value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#" - added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false
- Changed
get-stock-data2 fields changed- added
Input schema / $schemaAdded value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#" - added
Input schema / additionalPropertiesAdded value: +false
3 tool updates
- First observed
get-daily-stock-data - First observed
get-stock-alerts - First observed
get-stock-data
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The tools are highly ambiguous and overlapping. 'get-daily-stock-data' and 'get-stock-data' appear to serve nearly identical purposes, with no description to clarify their differences. 'get-stock-alerts' might be distinct but lacks context, making the overall set confusing and prone to misselection.
The naming is perfectly consistent, using a kebab-case pattern with a 'get-' prefix followed by a noun phrase. All three tools follow this exact convention, making them predictable and easy to parse.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin and under-scoped for a stock data server. It lacks essential operations like search, update, or delete, and the limited coverage suggests it may not support comprehensive agent workflows in this domain.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a stock data domain. It only provides 'get' operations with no ability to set, modify, or manage data (e.g., no create, update, delete, or search tools). This will cause significant agent failures in handling stock-related tasks.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for stocksense-ai documentation, generated by doc2mcp.
Alpha Vantage MCP — Stock market data, fundamentals, and earnings
- FensoryOAuthcom.fensory
Trading MCP server for AI agents, with live market data, account reads and controlled execution.
MCP server for OpenAI API (chat completions, image generation, embeddings) via AceDataCloud
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceThis is an MCP server that provides access to the Alpha Vantage API, allowing stock data retrieval to be used as context to LLMs.223 npm9MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript-based MCP server that fetches real-time stock market data and company financial information through the Alpha Vantage API.46-
- MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceThis is an MCP server that provides access to the Alpha Vantage API, allowing stock data retrieval to be used as context to LLMs.223 npmMIT