Scored across 16 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: scanning, explaining, fixing, triaging, or probing. Despite overlapping input types (e.g., multiple scanning tools), their outputs differ significantly (CBOM, inventory, plan, findings). Descriptions are detailed enough to prevent ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., generate_cbom, scan_path, verify_fix). No mixing of conventions or vague verbs, making the naming predictable and readable.
With 16 tools, the server is slightly above the typical 3-15 range for a well-scoped set. However, each tool fulfills a specific function in the PQC readiness workflow, so the count is justified and not excessive.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: scanning, inventory, planning, explaining, dependency checking, fixing, verification, triage, and endpoint probing. No obvious gaps exist for the stated domain of post-quantum readiness assessment and migration.