Skip to main content
Glama
quangmai911

Codex Work Window MCP

by quangmai911
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Codex Work Window MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • agent-work-mcp

      yurikaza
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to run persistent, budgeted work sessions with dependency graphs, human decision queues, required validation, and clean handoffs for autonomous or human-in-the-loop execution.
      16
      MIT

    • arjun-mcp

      quantumthoughter
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables host agents to launch and supervise durable, long-horizon AI jobs—starting, running, resuming, checking budgets, and inspecting assembled context—so tasks can survive restarts and outlive the conversation with verified completion.
      MIT

    • Codex Control Plane MCP

      DmitryMalik8328
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to drive Codex Desktop and codex-app-server as a durable async worker for long-running tasks: submit work and get an operation or workflow ID immediately, then poll status, handle approvals and Plan Mode, and read final reports, diagnostics, and history. It adds retry-safe submission, duplicate prompt protection, restart recovery, and worker/queue concurrency management so orchestration never requires holding a single MCP call open for hours.
      -

    • codex-reasonix-bridge

      qjgoisz
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Persistently connects Codex to Reasonix Studio so Codex can plan and verify while Reasonix executes, delegating tasks across shared multi-client sessions. Keeps tasks, sessions, approvals, results, and artifact fingerprints durable, with idempotent submission, workspace queuing, session reuse and recovery, manual adjudication of unknown outcomes, explicit retries, cancellation, and bounded shutdown.
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct phase of the work-window lifecycle: planning rules, saving state, and preparing a resume contract. There is no functional overlap or ambiguity about which tool to call.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use a two-word underscore convention and clearly describe their action, but the pattern is mixed: window_plan and checkpoint_save are noun-verb while resume_contract is verb-noun. This is a minor deviation from a strictly consistent verb_noun scheme.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools is well-scoped for a focused workflow around planning, saving, and resuming work windows. Each tool earns a clear place; nothing feels redundant or missing at the surface level.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core lifecycle of a work window: planning, checkpointing, and resuming. Minor gaps exist such as an explicit finalize/cancel action, but agents can work around those by planning a new window or not resuming.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources